@Sacha_Lord your Judicial Review should cover the unconstitutional way that the Coronavirus restrictions are being passed without scrutiny or consent from Parliament, which voted away its constitutional legislative power. This was contrary to English Bill of Rights (1689)
English Bill of Rights (1689), passed by Whigs, opposed by Tories, forever outlawed dictatorship by the executive: "That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regall Authority without Consent of Parlyament is illegall." legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar…
English Bill of Rights (1689) requires frequent, not six monthly scrutiny: “that for Redresse of all Grievances and for the amending strengthening and preserveing of the Lawes Parlyaments ought to be held frequently.“ legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar…
The right to Parliamentary rule cannot be lawfully voted away from all by the majority of MPs because the right for the redress of grievance through Parliament is an individual inviolable right for all MPs and all Subjects. These restrictions are therefore unconstitutional.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
