JUST IN: Prosecutors in AG Paxton criminal case ask judge to approve their $300 rate, noting that is what Paxton agreed to pay "an untested and unqualified rookie" to investigate allegations of federal misconduct in the Nate Paul matter.
"If Paxton's choice to pay Cammack $300 an hour appears to be disingenuous, it is only because it is: in successfully derailing this prosecution by spearheading a concerted effort to defund it, Paxton has referred to the Pro Tern's $300 hourly rate as unreasonable, unwarranted."
"No one - save and except for (Paxton)- can plausibly say that their collective experience as trial and appellate lawyers totaling 8 decades does not entitle the Pro Tems to be paid the same rate as Cammack, whose own experience, training and expertise is virtually microscopic."
Motion: "If this $300 hourly rate sounds familiar, it should: it is the very rate the Pro Tems were promised when they were appointed in 2015 but have been not been paid for their services since the first week of January 2016."
Paxton lawyers respond, saying prosecutors' request for $300/hour "lacks any legal analysis or merit."
"It is a naked attempt to insert irrelevant sensational allegations into this case to cause this Court to render a decision on an improper basis because there is no legal one."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: 5th Circuit Court STAYS trial judge ruling that required improved pandemic response in the state's geriatric prison, including frequent cleaning of common areas, giving COVID-19 information and providing hand sanitizer, masks, tissues and other hard to get items.
Appeals court says 2 plaintiff-inmates failed to exhaust their administrative remedies.
In addition, "their constitutional claim fails on the merits. TDCJ’s response, albeit imperfect, did not amount to
deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment."
Ruling: "To be sure, the district court identified lapses in TDCJ’s response to COVID-19. As a matter of policy, TDCJ could have done more to protect vulnerable inmates in the Pack Unit. But federal judges are not policymakers."
BREAKING: Federal judge GRANTS injunction barring enforcement of Gov. Abbott's order limiting counties to 1 mail-in ballot drop-off location.
Story to come.
Judge says Abbott’s order placed an unacceptable burden on the voting rights of elderly and disabled Texans, who are most likely to vote by mail and to hand deliver those ballots early to ensure that they are counted.
The developing story at: statesman.com/news/20201009/…
BREAKING: Gov. Abbott issues proclamation CLOSING (as of Oct. 2) satellite offices where voters can drop off completed mail-in ballots.
Counties can only have 1 dropoff point, he says.
Travis has 4, including 3 downtown.
Harris has 12.
Abbott says move, which also requires early voting clerks to let poll watchers observe ballot delivery, is an election security measure.
Clerks said the multiple dropoff spots were to help voters, particularly amid questions about Postal Service efficiency.
Read the proclamation, which amended Abbott's July 27 order that extended early voting and allowed early dropoff of mail ballots, here: gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/…
After Tuesday's order requiring 3 Green candidates to be reinstated to the ballot despite not paying a required candidate filing fee, the Texas Supreme Court today issued its opinion explaining why.
Stick with me on this. The logic path takes some explaining.
1/9
In an unsigned opinion with no justices recused, the Texas Supreme Court said the filing fee law, passed in 2019, does not contain a strict deadline to pay the candidate filing fee.
2/9
So when the Dems challenged the Greens for failing to pay it on Aug. 17, the Green co-chairs were under no legal duty to declare those candidates invalid because there was no deadline.
3/9
BREAKING: Texas Supreme Court orders Sec of State to "immediately take all necessary actions" to return 3 Green Party candidates stricken from the ballot.
Democrats had successfully challenged the candidates for failure to pay filing fees.
Ruling comes despite Harris County telling the court that it is way to late to add candidates to ballots that are set to be mailed to military on Friday.
Harris has 1,400+ different ballots to print.
The order says a ruling from the Supreme Court will follow.
Follow-up on Supreme Court blocking Harris County plan to send all voters a vote-by-mail application: 1. AG's office tells court it may file brief supporting the ban. 2. Charles Butt, owner of HEB, submits letter supporting Harris County.
Links to follow statesman.com/news/20200902/…