1/ quick thread on media obsession over "court packing" which is a straight up GOP talking point; pressrun.media/p/stop-calling…
2/ There's a reason Fox News uses the phrase "packing the courts" nearly ten times as often as CNN and MSNBC, according to TVeyes
3/ "Expanding the courts" is a more accurate description of what might take place during the next Democratic administration.
4/ In terms of radical Supreme Court behavior, let's not forget that during the waning weeks of the 2016 campaign, when even the GOP thought Trump would lose, Senate Republicans began announcing they would refuse to confirm any nominee put forward by President Hillary Clinton.
5/ the good news: the AP is getting it right, using "expanding" and referring to "packing" as a term Dem critics use
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DC press *desperately* wants this to be Both Sides story, then it doesn’t have address radical, hateful nature of GOP
also, GOP has been negotiating against itself re relief for moths! (WH vs GOP Senators who oppose) press has completely whitewashed that story, want to pretend Pelosi is holding up a deal
“Meanwhile, much of the "packing" coverage gets the history wrong, by repeating GOP claims that the Court "has had nine seats for 150 years”
This is false”
“For more than a year, between February 2016 and April 2017, the Supreme Court only had eight Justices because Republicans refused to hold hearings for Garland — Republicans effectively stripped the Court of one its seats. “
it was pure Beltway elite fantasy that Trump was going to show for three debates and not act like a lunatic; pressrun.media/p/why-the-deba…
a defining failure of Trump era;
“When one of the two candidates opts out of the real world and occupies an alternative universe where the Covid-19 virus will soon "disappear" from America, at that point, the debates no longer serve any real purpose”