Just finished Day 1 of the hearing on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to SCOTUS and realizing that the Republicans are not being straight - either about what is at stake or the reality of these hearings. THREAD
There is nothing typical about this hearing. A closed-door, multi-day event during a deadly pandemic is disturbing -made worse by the COVID outbreak in the Senate. npr.org/sections/live-…
There is no precedent for this illegitimate hearing and it's tearing down our democracy. It has NEVER happened in the history of this country that a SCOTUS judge was confirmed 22 days from Election Day. The Court will not recover. usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
Barrett will live up to Trump’s promises to end the Affordable Care Act and ban abortion. Her record tells us what we need to know. That’s before you get to the information she failed to disclose. They should be straight about this and #LetthePeopleDecidecnn.com/2020/10/09/pol…
The Republicans should be straight up with the people-they're ramming her through precisely because the vast majority of people do not want the future the Republicans are driving-they don’t want to lose health care or criminalize abortion. #LetThePeopleDecide#OurCourts
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I became a lawyer because my family had been plaintiffs in a groundbreaking school desegregation case. But I became a women's rights lawyer because of Justice Ginsburg. (1/5)
She paved the way for women lawyers like the ones at @NWLC, like the ones that founded the Law Center 48 years ago, and like the ones here today.
RBG laid the path for so many of us. She created meaning and protections in the constitution when it hadn't yet recognized sex discrimination protections. And she did it at a time when there were so few women lawyers.
Here’s what I didn’t get to say today at the House Education & Labor hearing on the new Title IX rule and gender bias in the Trump administration. The administration is arguing that this rule is justified by previous Supreme Court decisions.
It’s not. (THREAD)
In Davis v. Monroe, SCOTUS created a specific Title IX standard for students to bring lawsuits against their schools for failing to address sexual harassment and assault by other students. @NWLC knows this decision well — after all, we brought that landmark case.
While Betsy DeVos & the GOP witness today argued that the Dept of Education’s new Title IX rule is consistent with the Davis standard, the truth is that the Department threw out a legal standard it had been using for almost 20 years for schools’ responses to sexual harassment.
It’s important that we not create confusion about the reality of sexual violence that students experience and the rules that DeVos has proposed. Thread.
1) The violence that students face in schools has long been kept in the shadows. Few people come forward because they know they are unlikely to be believed. Or that their schools will treat the violence they endure as unimportant. The DeVos proposed rules will make this worse.
2)All survivors face deep skepticism. That is our culture at its worse and unfortunately our laws and processes have often reflected that idea.