May we please put to rest the "mainline decline"/"evangelical churches grow" nonsense? Let's talk about the most dramatic story - a decade of precipitous decline in white evangelical churches.
The percentage of white mainliners and white evangelicals is now the same: 15% of the population.
The mainline percentage have stayed within a 13-17% range for a decade; while the evangelical percentage has dropped 6-7 points at the same time.
*has stayed
Also note: the white mainline percentage has ticked up since 2016.
The old saw is "only conservative churches grow." Well, this puts that to rest.
A century of theological argument between the heirs of Fundamentalism and the heirs of Modernism has resulted in a numerical tie.
Note to smart politicians: Don't spend all your cash wooing white evangelicals who are probably going to continue voting GOP no matter what.
Put energy into speaking w/evangelicals of color, non-religious folks, white mainliners (who value civic participation), and RCs.
If you are going to base your view that the evangelical numbers are stable, you have to discount racial differences among evangelicals - differences that are significant in everything from theology to politics engagements to economic and social status.
Wrote a piece about this chart and its implications: Evangelical Decline, or Why Conservative Churches Are Shrinking:
It is very clear how Trump is using a race strategy in this election.
What is less discussed is his gender strategy.
He's trying to swing some percentage of Latinos and black men to join white men; and he's also trying to hold/swing certain white Xian women to vote w/men.
I've seen some analysis of the small shifts in support among some men of color (not a lot of them, but higher percentages than in 2016).
But the real prize is playing off the ideal of wifely submission in evangelical circles - and getting white Xian women strongly on board.
ACB is a perfect example of the Proverbs 31 wife, the ideal of many white evangelical women.
Analyzing and critiquing how a person interprets and practices their faith in relation to their world-view and political policies, especially in application of the law in a pluralistic nation, is a significant aspect of vetting.
Critics who don't understand religion may (and sadly often do) verge into intolerance & even bigotry.
And that's not a good thing.
But recognizing when leaders have theological positions that might harm or endanger others' rights or freedoms is necessary.
This is especially true for those who hail from religious traditions that value the life of the mind. Theology isn't a side issue, can't be compartmentalized. It is foundational to how people define basics like rights, human nature, and even to the meaning of the law itself.
A global cabal kidnaps children & teens to have sex w/power-hungry men in secret locations, men who are also involved in a traitorous plot to undermine democracy.
It isn't QAnon. It is the plot of a book published in 1836: The Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk, or, The Hidden Secrets of a Nun’s Life in a Convent Exposed.
In the book, the "cabal" was the Catholic Church & claimed this happened in a Montreal convent.
The book stirred outrage. The Canadians investigated it (Monk was Canadian) & found it to be a hoax. Even Protestants who wanted to believe it dismissed Monk as a fraud.
When Jesus heard this, he said to him, “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”
(photo from MI taken by a friend of a friend - its legit)
Also Jesus: “Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.”
(No guns or Trump mentioned)
More Jesus: “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me."
I keep thinking about a conversation I overheard in late November 2016 - in the breakfast room at a Hampton Inn in Louisiana.
I was speaking at a church. But it happened that there was a conference for Pentecostal pastors at the hotel.
I was still in shock from the election. Two pastors sat at the table next to me. They were talking about how excited they were about Trump.
They were excited that he was a businessman.
"About time," they said. "Somebody who can finally run this country like a business."
There have been countless articles about why white evangelicals support Trump.
But I've always thought about their conversation. A businessman. That's who they believed would fix things. Nothing more than that, no vision of political messiah.