Hello everyone. Some of you will have read this morning that we're proposing some changes at @NCVO as we take forward our new strategy. Like pretty much everyone, we're going through tough times. Let me explain. 1/
This year has been challenging for everyone - charities, businesses, government. People's lives disrupted, & worse, everywhere.
Charities & volunteers have mobilised, brilliantly. Adapted. Cared. We've helped those most affected by coronavirus and the consequences of lockdown.
And @NCVO mobilised quickly too - proving support and advice on what charities could do under the ever shifting rules, how and where they could access funding at the same time as pressing the government for much needed £ support.
Our membership model enabled this. Thank you.
Our amazing partners in the other umbrella bodies – too many to name all of them here – came together like never before.
Together we continue to make the case for why the work of charities is #NeverMoreNeeded. Why supporting people to volunteer & get involved is so important.
The incredible staff team @NCVO have worked tirelessly to move huge amounts of face to face training and events online. We've responded to more requests for help than ever. We've had hundreds of thousands of people ask us where they can volunteer to help in the crisis. 5/
But like many other charities, our income has been badly hit by the restrictions.
We now need to take some tough decisions to ensure we can support our members long into the future. Indeed, it was in the aftermath of another crisis - WWI - that we were established. 6/
It’s a decision that no CEO wants to face - rising demand for support that you know will make a difference. And the financial realities that mean a smaller staff team. I think we're all familiar with that one, if not the pace of change seen this year. 7/
The reductions in spending we will need to make are not as extensive as some other charities are having to make. I'm fully aware of how tough it is for our sector right now
I don't say this lightly - I'm really concerned about the Autumn/Winter as charities' reserves deplete.
So, we’ve begun consulting with staff this week on what a smaller NCVO might look like.
As ever, my @ncvo colleagues are brilliant and I want to put on record my huge respect for them. Their commitment to supporting charities and volunteering is unremitting. Thank you.
If implemented, we think our proposals will mean around 13 people leaving the organisation.
It’s devastating to lose such talented and dedicated people - who all feel passionate about the voluntary sector and the incredible things we can collectively achieve together.
We’ll update again once the consultation has concluded - there are more details here in the meantime: ncvo.org.uk/about-us/media…
Finally, since announcing our plans I've had countless emails and messages wishing us well at @ncvo. Thank you - I can't tell you how much this means to us.
I've never felt more part of such a wonderful community of compassionate, determined people than I do now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I am incredibly tired. Brain isn't working quite right. But my sense of today's much welcome announcements from @RishiSunak I will say upfront that I may well have got some of this wrong. 1/
This is great news for people across the country worried about whether they will have a job next week – and that includes people working for charities and not for profit organisations who are included in the scheme if they use PAYE. Thank you @OliverDowden@dianabarran. 2/
Charities are under *huge* pressure to lay people off as care, training, trading, activities - and their main sources of income (trading, fundraising) have very quickly fallen off. These are people working to support communities everywhere. This scheme helps re layoffs. 3/
1/ Have been mulling over #GE2019. Lots to think about for us working across civil society.
We're still living through times where society is still divided (anyone note the 52/48 result last night?). The future still seems uncertain, despite a clear result.
2/ There is much to do if we are to build the sustainable, prosperous, civilised society we all want, for everyone. Strikes me we've got to put creating public benefit on a par with creating wealth if we're going to do that.
3/ My message to the new government is that a thriving civil society, where people come together and get involved in their communities is, as it always was, critical in building a country that is sustainable, prosperous and civilised.
Fair amount of disdain for this in my Twitter feed. All understandable: too little, too late; no power; another talking shop; avoids dealing with policies that generate inequalities. 1/
All fair, it strikes me. But I would want to give this idea a hearing: could it become the equivalent of the Office for Budget Responsibility? With strong, high profile leadership; baked-in independence from ministers etc, this could challenge from within using govt’s own data 2/
So I think it deserves a hearing. But one last point: charities everywhere produce independent, balanced, high quality analysis based on robust evidence and data, like @jrf_uk. The challenge isn’t just data, or synthesis: it’s not listening enough to charities with expertise. 3/
So, at @NCVO we’ve been reading the @oxfamgb report from the @ChtyCommission. I’m inevitably drawn to the section on wider lessons for charities. I’ve snipped some bits and tweet them, plus a few final thoughts. 1/12
So, the first lesson from @oxfamgb: good governance matters. As trustees, we have to make sure we understand the risks our charities face. 2/12
Second lesson: safeguarding is *the* governance priority for charities. All charities. No ifs. No buts. @NCVO will help you on this - dont be afraid to ask us at @ncvo. We've got free help here: knowhow.ncvo.org.uk/organisation/o… 3/12
1/ Hmmm. How to design a fund to support 'left behind' communities. Lots of debate about this today (assuming of course that is the purpose of the fund). Funnily enough, civil society has been thinking about this for a bit. A good time to reflect in a thread, methinks.
£1.6bn isn't insignificant. In fact, it's almost as much as the £2bn in the next tranche of dormant assets that the government's own report from 2017 thinks might be available. More on that here if you are interested: bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi… We could change communities with that.
There's some frustration with today's £1.6bn announcement though. I'll sidestep the 'bribery' accusations and the 'drop in the ocean' type comments. Any money for these communities is welcome.
I'm more interested in how the fund will be managed/distributed for maximum impact.