See the unionist problem here? Everytime I've interviewed young voters in Scotland and asked them if they're in favour of independence, they look at me as if I've asked a stupid question. Westminster needs to think v big and v hard about this and there's little evidence of that.
Britain is a multi-national state with competing political preferences. As I've written many times, that requires very careful calibration. Theresa May was clearly very cognisant of this and once you understood that, you understood why she did many of the things she did.
I think May understood Brexit's capacity to deeply destabilise the Union. Not because it would make secession *easier* (it makes it harder, Scottish indy would be Brexit x 300) but because it makes it more *likely* because it reinforces a sense of the domination...
...of English political preferences through its larger population. Boris Johnson has prioritised this calibration far less. That coupled with his political personality, his particular form of Englishness, plus Covid and an impression that Sturgeon and the SNP have been far more..
....assured in their handling (not really backed up by data) has led to where we are. Though the fault is not just with Johnson. The truth is that the institutions of the union are not working. They are ramshackle. We have asymmetric devolution...
..a state which is neither unitary nor federal. An English political and governance question which has never been resolved.Successive governments have allowed these questions to go unanswered and our constitution to go on creaking...
...The best hope for the Union would probably be its reinvention, rehousing it in a new constitutional framework (federal parliament and so on). That would require proper imagination and verve from Westminster elites in a way not shown towards constitutional matters...
...for a generation. Patch and mend, or ignoring it, is almost certainly not going to work. But if history is anything to go by, it's what Westminster will try and do.
The role for the SNP and Yes and Westminster and No are potentially much different now than they were in 2014. Then there was no evidence consent for the Union had broken down. That's no longer the case. It makes the debate quite different and changes how each side will act.
Been reporting on these shifts a lot from Scotland. Latest report below
Talking to SNP figs throughout the day, it’s clear they’re both pleased but cognisant of the challenges ahead. Pleased (and a bit surprised) that despite many difficulties for them- Covid, in fighting, Ferrier-support for them and independence is not only holding up but growing.
They’re cognisant though that Westminster is going to start fighting harder. They’re also aware that they were further ahead in the polls ahead of the 2016 elections but still didn’t win a maj. If history repeats itself it could be damaging for their push for a second referendum.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@AndyBurnhamGM reading a statement from leaders in GM: “it is wrong to place some of the poorest part of England without economic support.”
Burnham says that Deputy CMO told GM leaders that to be effective the lockdown restrictions would have to go further than is proposed and include neighbouring regions.”
Says Dep CMO that only thing to work would be a national lockdown.
“GM and Lancashire are being set up as canaries in the coal mine for an experimental strategy”
We’re moving to a situation when most of the major English conurbations will be living under substantial restrictions in one form or another but with less national support than in spring. Beyond Treasury concerns about cost, it isn’t immediately obvious why that’s the case.
Treasury will point to the idea that restrictions are less severe than spring. But just because all businesses aren’t forced to close doesn’t mean restrictions aren’t a body blow. The signal alone has an effect on economic activity and banning inter household mixing...
...isn’t much removed from forcing them to close, as it removes so much opportunity for trade.
Wow. Extraordinary poll from Scotland, showing the biggest margin for independence yet, larger than the margin to remain in the Union in 2014. Of course just one poll but the sustained polling for yes is a) a big change b) of great potential political importance.
If we see more polls with a margin like this, it will be held up as proof that consent for the Union has simply broken down. Very hard to see how Westminster can simply ignore the breakdown of that consent if supported by SNP rout at Holyrood next year.
Wonder if the Prime Minister would still say this:
Meanwhile, President Trump’s (very packed rally) is in full swing. “I took something, I don’t know what the hell it was but it was a cure. I don’t know what it was. Antibodies, I dunno.”
“One great thing about being President is that you have more doctors than you thought existed in the world. I was surrounded by like 14 of ‘em.”
Of course millions of Americans basically don’t have access to doctors at all, at least, not that they can afford.
Chants now of “fill that seat! Fill that seat! Fill that seat!” from the crowd
The President smiles: “oh don’t worry, it’s being filled.”