What's weird about Grassley is that he's a person who believes in conservative legal principles in a way that exists *outside* of being a FedSoc schill. Like, he's from an era before the FedSoc completely captured the GOP and told them how to talk about the law.
It's not like Grassley *disagrees* with FedSoc. It's just that he comes to his beliefs a little differently than the FedSoc group think, and it shows in his presentation (of views I think are wrong)
It's hard to explain the daylight between a Grassley approach and a FedSoc one, but, it's a little about intellectual honesty (FedSoc purposely misleads people while Grassley really is that dumb, if you will).
And...
And...
It's a little about the Senate. FedSoc says "the congress should do the things we don't like the court to do" knowing full well Congress will never do those things.
Grassley actually thinks the Senate will *do things* and so the court should not get in the way.
Grassley actually thinks the Senate will *do things* and so the court should not get in the way.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
