@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth It _is_ ridiculous.

Let's call a spade a spade.

They owe me a single peer-reviewed study of contaminated masks hurting someone.
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth Meanwhile the WHO committee is busy suggesting that we ought to tell HCW about the harms of N95 marks.

Conly et al. from summer. ImageImageImage
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth Doing this on the fly. Here's their cite to the harm of respirators. Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth That, in turn, is this. Check authors. Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth Here is what i see for HARM. Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth No wait, page 12 has this: Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth Although on the next page saying this: Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth Here are footnotes 39-44 Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth 41. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…

Studying skin reactions to PPE, including gloves, which were the big problem. It's a descriptive study, and therefore subjective.

pic 2: surgical masks no adverse reactions but N95s did, and the reactions are described in the pic. ImageImage
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth 42. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…

A report of two HCW that wore N95 masks for 3 months during SARS. This caused acne (which they had when younger) to flare up.

Both responded well to treatment, I am pleased to report.

No comment on whether they preferred no N95 during SARS. Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth 43. journals.lww.com/dermatitis/Cit…

This was an abstract, so the below pic is it. That's what's reported. Image
@DavidElfstrom @skeila @WHO @ottawahealth 44. journals.lww.com/dermatitis/Abs…

This is a case report of a doctor who had quite a serious reaction to formaldehyde in gown + N95 mask worn (used to preserve it).

So this more correctly should have been cited in support of not using gowns. Surgical masks may have this issue. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Mesiano-Crookston

Jonathan Mesiano-Crookston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jmcrookston

30 Oct
Just posting the charts from the presentation referred to in this article.

Toronto: Image
Peel Image
Ottawa Image
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
Guess I'll just do a quick post about this.

Remember back in early 2020 when everybody was saying maybe masks would work to stop the spread?

But certain people said nah, masks don't work.
Well back in 2015 a hospital wanted HCW to vaccinate.

To encourage vaccination, they implemented a policy that if the HCW did not vaccinate, they had to wear a mask for their entire shift.
Unfortunately when it went to arbitration the hospital had then to justify its argument that masks stopped outbound transmission (source control).

Case is here. Appendices are full of references about masks, including working for source control.

canlii.org/en/on/onla/doc…
Read 6 tweets
11 Oct
Hey, I'm just waving hello from April 16th!

How's it going in October, guys?
Uhh, never mind. Listen, I'll close this door behind me ...
By the way, Wired from mid-March:

wired.com/story/they-say…

Wired is under-rated.
Read 4 tweets
9 Oct
Diseases listed as "airborne" in the Control of Communicable Diseases Manual.

Aspergillosis
Brucellosis
Chickenpox
Read 27 tweets
9 Oct
That is the oldest public health excuse in the book.

For $420,000 per year plus pension, do better.

No acknowledgment that this transmits via aerosol so indoor spaces dangerous, means people distancing 2m are still at risk.

We are well into negligence territory.
Just a reminder that the government was not liable during SARS because it argued that it was making policy decisions, not operational ones. So nurses sued their employer.

Getting the science wrong is not a policy decision.

Enjoy.
You can see the Crown liability laid out here, in s. 95 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act. (Also under the CPLA as well if you click through to that Act.)

canlii.org/en/on/laws/sta…
Read 5 tweets
9 Oct
Humans are creatures of habit. About the 1918 flu.

Leaders knew lockdowns were good but kept economies running. At that time, for the war. Image
A President covered up his sickness ... Image
And the 2d wave of the flu was most deadly because everybody was, on a global level, mixing ... Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!