THREAD: Was Oregon's heralded statewide 4plex bill just for show?

That's the upshot if recently proposed implementing regs are adopted in their current form. 1/9
The statute (HB 2001) requires cities with population > 25,000 to allow designated "middle housing" types "in areas zoned for residential use." 2/9
Cities must adopt a state-approved middle-housing zoning plan by specified date, or else apply default zoning rules issued by state agency. In principle, this solves problem of cities "allowing" 4plexes on paper but making them impossible to build in practice. 3/9
The pending regs establish the default zoning rules, as well as criteria for state approval of cities' middle-housing plans. But buried in the approval criteria is a "performance" loophole that threatens the entire venture... 4/9
This loophole allows cities to use the standards of an existing residential zone if *3% of new housing in that zone* has been "middle housing." 5/9
Consider how this would play out in an exclusionary suburb that already "allows" townhomes--in a zone where virtually nothing can be built owing to fees, parking requirements, yard requirements, height limits, FAR limits, architectural standards, permitting vetopoints, etc. 6/9
Assume 1000 lots in the zone. Over past decade, 10 lots were redeveloped, 9 for SFH and one for townhomes (yield: 3 townhomes). The redevelopment rate is trivial (0.1% annually), but b/c > 3% of what got built was middle housing, this zone would qualify for safe harbor. 7/9
And it's not just this zone that's exempted. Under draft regs, city may exempt its other residential zones from the state's default upzoning by applying the same standards to them. 8/9
I know nothing of the backstory here, but there's a lesson for enthusiasts of statewide upzoning bills: don't lose track of the state admin law ball... 9/end @ProfSchleich @RickHills2 @DBRodriguez5 @dilleradollar @MiriamSeifter @dillonliam @mlevinreports @cayimby @anniefryman

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Elmendorf

Chris Elmendorf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CSElmendorf

27 Jun
Earlier this month, @California_HCD posted a little-noticed memo that massively increases the amount of "zoned capacity" for new housing that local governments must provide. This thread explains it. 1/n

hcd.ca.gov/community-deve…
CA requires local govts periodically to adopt a state-approved plan, called a "housing element," to accommodate local share of regional housing need. A housing element must inventory developable sites and estimate their capacity. 2/
If aggregate site capacity is less than local govt's housing target, local gov't must rezone for greater density and allow by-right development of 20%-affordable projects (speedier permitting, fewer cumbersome conditions). /3
Read 13 tweets
1 Jan 19
CA housing folks: Why haven't builders exploited the state law exempting 20%-affordable projects from zoning / plan in cities that don't accommodate enough? @YIMBY_Law @hanlonbt @anniefryman @CAHousingPod @michaeldlane @ProfSchleich @RickHills2 @kookie13 @kimmaicutler 1/17
This thread explains relevant California law, then suggests possible answers and a legislative fix. 2/17
(And if anyone knows of examples / case studies on point, please share!) 3/17
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!