I was too crass here. I think they made the wrong calls but these things are not simple.
The reality is no journalist should be having to deal with potential misinformation and foreign intervention. The people ultimately to blame here are dirty tricksters, not solid reporters trying to figure out how to fairly deal with this stuff.
I have the luxury of not having to write a newsletter multiple times a day and also have spent a lot of time thinking about things like the dossier and hacked emails. I don't know what call I'd make in a different situation.
One drum I have been beating for a long time is that the Wikileaks emails were actually *edited and altered* That's been underdidscussed. The online news biz is really focused on speed but we have to tread carefully with this sort of thing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hunter Walker

Hunter Walker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hunterw

14 Oct
This is important context to today's news. You have a questionable story published by a paper funded by a right wing billionaire. And some of the people making the most noise arguing the story is legit are also possibly being funded by a right wing billionaire.
Based on my mentions, a lot of folks are confusing the Federalist Society and the Federalist. It's an easy mistake to make! Both are backed by, as @SenWhitehouse put it yesterday, "big anonymous money." google.com/amp/s/slate.co…
And that gets to one of the most important things I realized after moving to DC from Brooklyn in 2017. There is a whole ecosystem of ideological organizations and media outlets here that aren't funded through commercial means or grassroots support.
Read 6 tweets
14 Oct
A lot of folks are curious about who funds the Federalist right?
I have some answers for you! Let me just pull up my old Google doc ...
OK. Here goes ...
Read 14 tweets
14 Oct
So, let me get this right, a computer shop owner in Delaware saw a Biden sticker on a laptop, went through their customers private correspondence, and turned it over to Rudy Giuliani and the feds? google.com/amp/s/nypost.c…
Hunter Biden's business dealings are absolutely a little swampy and gross. We've known this without needing another batch of questionably obtained emails.
I am generally opposed to bringing up Trump's issues whenever people talk about Biden but it feels important in this case
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
The claim that @CoryBooker didn't live in Newark was a thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory that was spread by his first Senate opponent and far right activist Chuck Johnson who worked for both the Daily Caller and an anti-Booker PAC.
.@CoryBooker literally let his constituents hang out in his living room when he was mayor. google.com/amp/s/observer…
And if you'd like to learn a bit about one of the guys who first spread this Cory Booker conspiracy theory that Trump is reviving, check out this story. talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/top-aide-be…
Read 5 tweets
12 Oct
Sending me crude DMs this morning was the final straw on this one. I rarely do this but it was overdue and definitely the right call. Image
He's one of the folks who thinks it's somehow a giant gift to Biden to say that Biden's evasive answers on "court packing" actually constitute clear position - he's not ruling it out and it should be followed up on and covered as such.
I remain confused why some conservatives think it's somehow good for Biden to focus on the fact he's clearly leaving this option on the table rather than pretending there's nothing to glean from his answers.
Read 6 tweets
11 Oct
I understand Biden hasn't directly answered the question on "court packing," but his position actually seems pretty clear to me?
Biden is clearly indicating he's open to court reform. He's not ruling it out or taking it off the table. Biden is indicating frustration with what happened with MerricK Garland and now Coney Barrett. It seems like his ultimate position may be defined by how that unfolds.
It's not the most direct or transparent answer in the world, but it's also not the black box of utter mystery some reporters frame it as. I suspect it's kind of reaching to find something to hammer Biden on amid continued relentless questions for Trump on taxes and COVID tests.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!