Aside from the obvious misinformation in the NYPost Hunter Biden stories, the media attention to it while underreporting the financial activities of the Trump children is more troubling.
While traditionally, first families are off-limits, Trumps have misused and weaponized it.
Unlike past first families:
The Trump children are intimately engaged in the running of government;
Trump & family have refused to divest/recuse themselves from financial conflicts of interest;
Trump & family's financial interests are intertwined.
Unlike past first families:
Trump family members have significant undisclosed foreign financial obligations that may affect their policy judgements;
Trump overrode security constraints to limit the impact of their access to sensitive national security info & decisions.
Unlike past first families:
Trump children have received financial benefits conferred by foreign governments *during* Trump's term in office. See, e.g. trademarks granted by the Chinese.
Trump businesses received financial payments from the Secret Service, at Trump's direction.
Unlike past first families:
Trump considered including his daughter on the ticket as Vice President.
His son's girlfriend headed the party convention.
They are intimately engaged in both the business of campaigning and governing.
OTOH:
Biden has been in government so long that he doesn't have outside financial interests to complicate his governance.
Hunter was never invited in to govern and his finances are separate.
Biden respects and follows conflict of interest guidance.
Without an understanding of the contextual differences between the two families, media reporting on Hunter Biden is allowing the Trump campaign to weaponize bothsidesism to create a false impression of corruption.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OTD, nineteen years ago, I was in law school in San Francisco, back where I am right now, when I woke up to a phone call from a high school friend.
“Turn on the TV.” “A plane just hit the World Trade Center.”
In the early morning light, as news anchors tried to make sense of the smoking gash where a plane went into the tower, wondering if it was an accident, I watched, incredulous, as a second plane crashed into the towers.
The world exploded.
I rushed to campus, hearing the news that a third plane had hit the Pentagon, and that a fourth plane was missing.
They were putting up blue barricades around the buildings in the Civic Center and evacuating the area.
@votevets Then, I was working for Senator Kennedy, who was vehement about calling Massachusetts families in their grief. He himself came from a Gold Star family, and had a special bond with them.
I remember getting the notification of Alexander Arredondo's death. and the aftermath.
Today is the 75th anniversary of the bombing of #Hiroshima.
It was the 1st time a nuclear weapon was used in anger & it left a searing impression on the world.
But that impression is fading, and with it the political consensus to address arms control. #Hiroshima75 <thread>
Eleven United States Senators were born before Hiroshima.
Of those, only five were older than 5 years old when the bomb was dropped.
Of the five who were old enough to remember that event, only one, @SenFeinstein, is a champion for non-proliferation.
None of the four Republican Senators old enough to remember Hiroshima voted in support of New START, the signature nuclear arms control agreement between the US and Russia.
New START is up for renewal in the beginning of 2021, and the negotiations are taking place right now.
But seriously, the study in the op-ed shows that despite a perception that women and minorities have a leg up in the hiring process, they are actually *discounted* for having the same qualifications as white men.
So, if you're a white man out there thinking that the women and minorities out there are "diversity" hires and therefore less qualified, actually, they (we) had to work harder to land the job.
Actually interfering with people's right to vote by placing unidentified federal agents at polling places enough to sway the election is logistically and legally infeasible.
Unlike the protection of federal property, the feds have no authority over most polling locations.
But even assuming they ignored the authority question and tried to post up at polling locations to shut them down or intimidate voters
a) it's clearly a violation of the law;
b) they don't have sufficient manpower to interfere at all the voting locations they'd need to target.