Before starting this thread, I’ve really noticed a big uptick in people struggling in terms of mental health this month. Here is the thread with my best advice of what to do if you’re feeling depressed: 0/24

THREAD: @RynoWeiss & I wrote how Twitter’s enormous gaffe w/r/t banning the Biden @nypost article demonstrates 3 important concepts for understanding censorship: The Streisand Effect, Censorship Envy, & the Slippery Slope Tendency. 1/24

thefire.org/the-nypost-twi…
#NYPost published an article about docs given to them by @RudyGiuliani, allegedly scraped from a laptop owned by Joe Biden’s son.
FB & Twitter took steps to “limit its spread.” Twitter took the possibly unprecedented step of blocking the article from being tweeted or DMed. 2/24
Voices across the political spectrum, (even those who praised FB’s response) condemned Twitter’s heavy-handed approach. You couldn’t even share the article, quote from its sections, or screenshot them even if your goal was to critique them. 3/24
The criticism pointed to how Twitter’s ban not only didn’t help, but was actually counterproductive to stop the article’s spread.

I.e. The Streisand Effect, coined by @mmasnick — the tendency for suppression of information to ensure that way more people end up seeing it. 4/24
When you tell someone they can’t share a piece of information, you activate some lizard part of their brain that says, “No, screw you!” & motivates them to spread it as far & as wide as possible. 5/24
In most cases, this motivation to spread information is orders of magnitude larger than the motivation warranted by the information itself. (Who ACTUALLY cares about Barbra Streisand’s house?) 6/24
That’s probably the case here. Twitter & FB forbidding this information ensured all outlets covered a story that would have just circulated in conservative media for a couple days.
FB & Twitter could scarcely have done a worse job “limiting the spread.” 7/24
Free speech advocates are often accused of employing the “slippery slope fallacy,” meaning that the damage done tomorrow exists only in our heads, & that some censorship now doesn’t actually mean more censorship tomorrow. 8/24
When it comes to censorship, the slope is in fact quite slick & at least in regards to free speech, & you have what I’d call a “slippery slope tendency.”

Twitter is a pretty excellent study in the slippery slope tendency. 9/24
8 years ago, Twitter’s executives described themselves as the “free speech wing of the free speech party” when resisting calls from the United Kingdom government to censor more speech.

A couple years later, they backed down & began to censor content in other countries. 10/24
Later, they implemented policies banning hate speech based on race & gender, then began banning speech that wasn’t hateful but was “dehumanizing.”

Eventually they grew the categories to include that which dehumanizes on the basis of religion, & then on the basis of age. 11/24
At this point, Twitter represents the censorship wing of the panicked appeasement party.

Facebook similarly evolved from a defender of free speech to employing literally the most censors the world has ever seen. 12/24
The slippery slope tendency doesn’t just apply to categories of banned speech — the tactics of the bans tend to slip as well, until you get to the point where Twitter won’t even let you link to something forbidden, even to criticize it. 13/24
So what drives the slide? What greases the slope? In part, it’s Censorship Envy.

Censorship Envy, as defined by @VolokhC “The common reaction that, ‘If my neighbor gets to ban speech he reviles, why shouldn’t I get to do the same?’” 14/24

washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-co…
Hating unfairness is human nature, felt in early childhood when one sees another child get a toy we really want for ourselves (Rom the Space Knight in my case)

It’s not even just HUMAN nature—even monkeys feel affronted when given unequal rewards. 15/24

npr.org/sections/healt…
We feel envy & acute unfairness when we see another group receiving privileges or treatment that we feel we deserve as well. 16/24
When a hypothetical Muslim sees FB ban hate against black Americans, they may demand FB censor the next anti-Muslim post. When a hypothetical Christian sees Twitter censoring anti-Muslim speech, they might demand they censor the next post hating on Christianity. 17/24
When I, a hypothetical old man (extremely hypothetical), see that posts are banned for insulting Christians, I would demand that they delete the next whippersnapper that asks me for a Werther’s Original. 18/24
Our sense of fairness practically demands that the circle of proscribed speech gets larger over time & almost never shrinks.

The censorship cat is very hard to put back in the bag. I don’t have a clear answer for how to stop this cycle, other than not to start it. 19/24
One important caveat I want to make clear: Misinformation is a tough issue. There are already stories suggesting that this information given to the Post is Russian disinformation.

Do I believe this could be true? Of course I do, & you should too. 20/24

businessinsider.com/us-intelligenc…
My family on my dad's side is Russian from close to the Ukraine border.

My dad consumes a lot of Russian media, & I argue with him when it seems that he’s consuming Russia’s state-controlled news without enough skepticism. I can forgive him that because he's 94. 21/24
As a general rule, if information comes out about politics in Ukraine, always remind yourself that Russia has an intense interest in what happens there & in undermining US-Ukraine relations.

Be skeptical of news that advances the interest of global powers, even the US 22/24
Disinformation is a major challenge for #freespeech. Still, I believe that Twitter has made a big mistake that will haunt them.

At the same time, I’m very curious to find out what investigations into whether this information is true, & how it was obtained, will reveal. 23/24
BONUS: If you’d like to learn about another key concept for free speech, check out my thread on the “Bedrock principle” 24/24

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Lukianoff

Greg Lukianoff Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @glukianoff

5 Feb
THREAD: For some fun TGIF fare let’s highlight some great @TheFIREorg gifs (TGIGIFs?) made by our AMAZING comms staff! (All of which are available through the gif button on Twitter & Facebook!) 1/8
I LOVE this animation of the logo for my blog, the Eternally Radical Idea! It salutes 3 once-radical ideas — the earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun, the structure of hydrogen AND Doctor Manhattan’s iconic symbol! 2/8

thefire.org/category/etern…
This adorable gif is from our Speech Code of the Month for February 2021. We feel like we’re stuck in a Groundhog’s Day-style time loop, having complained about this civility policy @JohnsHopkins since 2006! 3/8

thefire.org/february-2021-…
Read 10 tweets
27 Jan
Today on ERI: @AdGo calls out @UCF for its attempt to fire tenured prof @CharlesNegy in a way that "will undermine the concept of academic freedom." (1/22)

thefire.org/ucf-is-killing…
In Dec. 2019, students complained about Negy’s tweets, calling them racist & harmful; @UCF said they were #freespeech. In June 2020, students complained again. This time, @UCF solicited more complaints & opened an investigation. (2/22)

ucf.edu/news/addressin…
The day after that, @UCF held a video chat where students asked about Negy. Admin said, “the wheels are in motion… believe that by the time you get on the campus as a freshman, it will have been dealt with.” (The “it” was Prof Negy.) (3/22)

Read 24 tweets
14 Jan
For part 7 of our “Catching Up With ‘Coddling’” series, I sat down with @TheAtlantic’s @katejulian to take a long look at the role of parents in childhood anxiety, some potential causes, AND a promising new treatment. 1/15

thefire.org/catching-up-wi…
If you haven’t seen it yet, “Catching Up With ‘Coddling’” is where we revisit the topics in @JonHaidt & my 2018 book, “The Coddling of the American Mind,” with new data, developments, and caveats. 2/15

thefire.org/tag/eri-catchi…
.@katejulian’s May cover story in The Atlantic, “What Happened to American Childhood,” focuses squarely on how parental anxiety contributes to anxiety in kids, & what parents (who are sometimes irrational/afraid) can do about it. 3/15

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Read 17 tweets
23 Dec 20
THREAD: So @vox writer @seanilling just said that ppl like me worry too much about #freespeech b/c “speech has never been freer.” Bizarre assertion in 2020. Speech was probably freer in 2005 before the "democratic recession" began, but it was certainly freer in, say, 2015. (1/65)
It’s important to address this because there’s been a trend in “nothing to see here,” thinly sourced stories claiming that nobody should really worry about free speech, Cancel Culture, or any of these themes. (2/65)
So, where to begin?

First, I'll start with the global picture, but don't worry, I'll get to my specialty, censorship in US higher education, later in this thread.

Bottomline: The situation for global #freespeech has gotten worse this year & over the past several years (3/65)
Read 67 tweets
16 Dec 20
6 hot tips before accusing me or @TheFIREorg of #freespeech hypocrisy for missing your pet case or cause:

1) Do a search on our website. Good chance we've already written on it.
2) If we JUST found out about it or it JUST happened, we are probably already looking into it diligently in addition to the *1500* other cases we got this year.
3) Ask yourself: "Shouldn't I do some basic research first before slamming folks? Might I be unfairly smearing a field involving serious & devoted professionals who do work I don’t even bother to look into?”
Read 7 tweets
14 Nov 20
So your standard is now “prove to me that you were forced out of your website/newspaper for ideological error, but my starting place is those concerned are [insert series of insults]?”
It doesn’t concern you that big time names like @mattyglesias @sullydish @bariweiss @ggreenwald all departing just since JULY are saying pretty much the same thing? (@JBennet & MANY others not included because they didn’t say anything or much)
I understand you are much more concerned about other aspects of the culture war. That’s fine. I am too. But you have a lot of friends & followers who have spent countless hours reporting on problems relating to unusually intense conformist norms coming from campus, like...
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!