Wow! Here’s a lengthy interview of Steve Bannon by a Sky News Australia reporter. Bannon is on Fire, with details that not one US media figure in the US has published, let alone even asked.
Some highlights: Bannon eagerly encourages the Dems and the MSM to play the “Russian disinformation” game. He says one thing he learned from Andrew Breitbart is how to roll something like this out. Do it slowly, holding back the most damning stuff, in hopes that the targets wil
.... make the mistake of prematurely going public with a phony defense before they know all you actually have. Bannon says the worst is still to come, by design. He has more evidence that Hunter’s lawyer called around to repair shops in Wilmington b/c Hunter didn’t remember where
Yesterday I opined there were three massive scandals associated with Hunter’s laptop: Biden family corruption, FBI coverup, and media censorship. Watching MSM reporting about FBI sources (plus Schaffer’s, Clapper, etc.) claiming Russian disinformation, I want to add Scandal No 4:
IMO someone or some group likely viewed the laptop and whatever other hidden evidence exists, as an insurance policy to control Biden. If he got out of line, evidence could be made public, Hunter goes to jail, and President Biden resigns in disgrace. It’s called extortion.
So the question is, who, besides the Chinese, holds the keys? Obama? FBI and CIA? DOD? The swamp generally?
Here is a lengthy interview of the owner of the Mac shop who turned Hunter Biden’s laptop and it’s contents over to the FBI in Dec 2019 and then to Rudy Giulani’s lawyer in Sept 2020 : thedailybeast.com/man-who-report…
Highlights: Someone who identified himself as Hunter brought in 3 laptops with water damage in April 2019. One was a total loss and the shop owner, who is legally blind, gave it back. A second one needed only a keyboard replacement, which was done and that laptop was given back
The third laptop was kept to download as many files as could be retrieved onto an external hard drive. He found “millions” of files on the desk top, and he manually dragged each from the damaged computer to a the external hard drive. The customer never came back to pick it up
@shipwreckedcrew Interesting contrast b/w Mueller’s so-called bulldog, Andrew Weissmann, and Mueller’s chief deputy, Aaron Zebley. One correction though: Gen George Meade led the Army of the Potomac at Gettysburg. Meade, not McClellan, didn’t pursue Lee’s defeated army after the battle was won.
@shipwreckedcrew One major issue that jumps out of this article summarizing Weissmann’s blame game with Zebley: While Weissmann was advocating a tougher, scorched earth strategy with Trump by issuing a grand jury subpoena for his testimony, Weissmann ignores the handshake deal w Trump’s lawyers
@shipwreckedcrew ... Under that deal the president and entire WH staff undertook a massive effort to cooperate w the SCO, producing over 1 million documents and submitting to dozens of interviews without raising executive privilege. Without that deal the investigation would still be going on.
@shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew does the best job I’ve seen of explaining why it’s not the job- indeed the Constitution prohibits it- for an executive branch employee such as an FBI agent or director, to launch a counterintelligence investigation of a duly elected president to determine whether
@shipwreckedcrew ... he is a threat to national security. If the president commits crimes that threaten national security, it’s Congress’ job to impeach. If what’s at stake is a difference of opinion on how best to keep the country safe, that’s an issue for the voters in elections to decide.
@shipwreckedcrew But employees of the executive branch answer to the president, who is exclusively in charge of determining foreign policy. If employees disagree, talk to the president or someone close to him. If that doesn’t help, quit. Write a book. Become a whistleblower if you believe there
... wherein FBI lawyer seizes on ambiguity in CIA correspondence regarding C Page’s status, ignores unambiguous phrase describing what Page actually does (“provides reporting to us”), engages in willful blindness by refraining to 1) look at the underlying memo cited by the CIA
and 2) not following up with CIA to clear up the ambiguity, as they offered to do, to the end that FBI lawyer could adhere to his belief (or hope) that Page wasn’t a source. @AndrewCMcCarthy describes a corrupt lawyer engaging in a dishonest act and covering it up with ...