At the start of the year, PM Jacinda Ardern was in danger of losing the next election in NZ. But she just won a historically large victory, likely allowing Labour to be the first party to govern NZ alone since 1993, when NZ reformed its constitution to encourage coalition govts.
Nobody should be surprised that the key to Ardern's victory was her successful response to COVID-19.
If Donald Trump loses in two weeks, many will blame the pandemic for his defeat. But this would be getting things precisely wrong.
Like Ardern, Trump was quite unpopular at the start of 2020 and was likely to lose his bid for reelection. Unlike Ardern, when faced with the pandemic, he reacted disastrously.
Since the start of the pandemic, Trump's approval ratings haven't cratered. They've just stayed more or less the same.
Far from dooming Trump's presidency, the pandemic was a great opportunity for Trump to secure reelection. An even moderately successful response might have actually moved those poll numbers in his favor.
But Trump's incompetence, indifference to the lives of most other people, lack of interest in doing his job, and narcissism made his flailing, non-response to the pandemic overdetermined.
There may be no better measure of what a lousy politician Donald Trump is than the fact that he didn't even understand that the pandemic _was_ a political opportunity, that taking it seriously and caring about Americans' health and lives was in his own political self-interest.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Alpers 🗽

Ben Alpers 🗽 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ben_Alpers

19 Oct
This piece is practically journalistic malpractice. The US has long lines because the GOP wants fewer people, especially people of color, voting. And when it controls state governments, it does what it can to make voting more difficult. Long lines are an intentional outcome. 1/
Long lines at polling places are not a technical problem. There's no mystery at all in how to eliminate lines. Plenty of (blue) states do so. Solving the problem of long lines will involve either shoring up the constitutional right to vote or simply defeating Republicans. 2/
Unfortunately, the latter solution is at best temporary and the former solution can always be undone by a GOP Supreme Court, as the Roberts Court turned the 15th Amendment's enforcement clause into dead letter in Shelby County. 3/
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
I find this Jill Lepore op ed extremely frustrating. 1/ washingtonpost.com/outlook/truth-…
To begin with, though Lepore treats them as essentially similar, a truth and reconciliation commission and criminal prosecutions of the Trump administration represent opposite impulses. 2/
As their name suggests, truth and reconciliation commissions trade away justice for knowledge of the truth and a chance to reestablish social solidarity. They often feature amnesty for witnesses and perpetrators willing to come forward and tell their stories. 3/
Read 22 tweets
20 Sep
That serious people argue against Democrats adding seats to the Supreme Court BECAUSE OF THE NORMS is extraordinary and depressing....though at some level unsurprising. 1/
I am not one of those who think that norms are unnecessary or a pack of shitlib nonsense (that was the Flavor of the Month among the anti-anti-Trump "left" a couple years back). In fact, I don't think any constitutional arrangement is meaningful without functioning norms. 2/
But (and I feel silly writing this because it should be so extraodinarily obvious) norms are not an absolute good. Some norms are, in fact, terrible. Racism and patriarchy, too, rely on norms to function. 3/
Read 20 tweets
9 Aug
There are at least two things that distinguish the contemporary GOP from far-right, ethnonationalist parties in Europe: 1) the GOP is (in theory and practice) anti-majoritarian; 2) the GOP remains ideologically opposed to the welfare state, even for the Herrenvolk.
In Europe, parties like Poland's ruling far right Law and Justice Party have greatly expanded the welfare state. They won in part as a reaction to neoliberal policies of center-left or (as in the case of Poland) center-right parties that reduced the size of the social safety net.
In the late 20th century, the U.S., too, saw its center-left party join its center-right party in whittling away our welfare state, which was already smaller than those in most European countries.
Read 30 tweets
23 Feb
Broken Record Time: all wings of the Democratic Party need to turn out in November if we're going to beat Trump. I think some candidates will have an easier time doing this than others. 1/
But threatening not to vote for a particular candidate or predicting that that a particular candidate will necessarily fail to do this just makes it harder for Democrats to win in the fall. 2/
Political Twitter is basically pretty poisonous. This website encourages the sort of simplistic, manichean thinking and mob behavior that actively interfere with building unity among people with serious disagreements. 3/
Read 6 tweets
22 May 19
In evaluating House Democratic leadership's refusal to open an impeachment inquiry, historians' most common comparisons have been (understandably): Watergate (nicely discussed by @KevinMKruse), Clinton's impeachment, and Iran-Contra. But I've been thinking about another one: 1/
In November 2006, in the wake of Dems retaking the House in George W. Bush's second midterm elections, there was also a lot of talk about impeachment. But Nancy Pelosi, who was about to become Speaker for the first time, was having none of it. 2/

archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.co…
As they took power in 2007, Pelosi and the Democratic leadership did what they're doing now. They refused to consider impeachment. They figured that the politically smart move was to look toward 2008 and retaking the White House. 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!