The @the3million letter writing campaign to your MPs has been amazing this week! We thought the House of Lords letter writing was awesome but almost three times as many of you have written to MPs so far.
Whatever happens in the House of Commons debate (and we can take a guess, given how the Govt whips MPs to vote), the message IS getting through and MPs ARE beginning to question the digital-only status.
We are winning the argument.
One Conservative MP mentioned the standard soundbites then added "However I do understand the predicament you have that you cannot print the evidence and digital proof cannot always be accessed"
Another Conservative MP said that normally they would argue for digital, but would look at the materials sent carefully because they didn't want anyone to lose out.
Secondly, a couple of important push-backs to the most common 'soundbites' that you'll receive.
Common soundbite 1: "digital by default", as in "Those granted status under the scheme will be given a digital status, as part of moving the UK immigration system to digital by default"
WELL(1): look at what the Government's OWN review of their digital right-to-work check said:
Common soundbite 1: "digital by default"
Well (2): look at what the Science and Technology Select Committee said in its report 'Digital Government':
Common soundbite 2: "digital cannot be lost damaged or tampered with".
Well (1): look at what happened to one of the authors of @InLimboBrexit (PS buy this amazing book, and send it to your MP!). Status changed - BY THE HOME OFFICE
Common soundbite 2: "digital cannot be lost damaged or tampered with"
Well (2): look at what happened to Paula - her pre-settled status disappeared from the system.
So please - keep writing! Keep asking for meetings! Keep convincing your MP - this is a completely non-partisan, common-sense, pragmatic ask, and we are winning the argument.
While I welcome the promises in this article towards those who don't apply for status under the EU settlement scheme, because they are considered to have a "reasonable grounds" (it mentions example of 8-yr old 'looked-after' child), I am very confused. 1/ theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
In the article, @AlbertoCostaMP says that "the minister [@kevin_j_foster] has assured parliament that EU nationals who fail to apply by the grace period deadline of 30 June will remain legally here if they have a reasonable excuse".
I would be overjoyed if that were true. 2/
After all, it is one of the problems that @the3million has been highlighting in the absence of a declaratory status. (see 'Interim Status' on page 2 of our briefing t3m.org.uk/t3m_SafeSettle…).
Amendment 3 on the Immigration Bill seeks to address this (@childrensociety) 3/
EU citizens will have to rely on a digital-only status to prove their rights after June next year.
To me, it is sheer common sense that a physical backup is needed, because digital - while lovely when it works - doesn't always work.
I've been arguing this from...
... first principles for almost two years now.
We know large computer systems often fail - in general.
But recently, the list of just Government IT failures have been staggering.
Let me list a few, then tell me that EU citizens don't need a physical backup of their status.
Let's first just look at the passage of the immigration bill through parliament. (I've chosen that bill because there's an amendment on it, to give us physical proof of status, to be debated and voted on tomorrow, Monday 5th October).
My lovely (widowed) mum lives in the Netherlands. If she needs my help in future, I want to be able to move and look after her.
If I had JUST UNTIL MARCH 2022 to be able to make that move and bring my British husband, I would be in a total panic.
Luckily, the Dutch government..
.. recognises how unfair that would be, given that I moved to the UK under EU free movement.
So they've clearly stated that I will keep that right (to bring my British husband to NL) for my lifetime.
The UK government on the other hand, is not being so kind to its own citizens.
They are ripping that right away from British citizens who, under EU free movement had legitimate expectation they could return to the UK in future with their family.
Why are they doing this?
It's genuinely beyond me. We're talking a finite group of people.
I feel this otherwise excellent article misses the point entirely when it says "One of the strengths of the Westminster parliamentary system is that it occasionally produces governments with real power to effect change, should they try to enact it." 1/ theatlantic.com/international/…
This is hoping for two things to come along at once - a party with a good majority and a uniquely talented leader.
And at the same time expecting that party to act in the UK's long term interest, whereas the UK's parliamentary system uniquely rewards short termism. 2/
The major difference between the systems of the US / UK on the one hand, and Germany and the Netherlands on the other, is the difference between winner-takes-all systems, and cooperate & compromise systems.
3/
"You are our friends, neighbours and colleagues, and we want you to stay"
Except we'll make your life difficult, chuck extra obstacles in your way, will give you settled status but will keep checking other stuff so you don't feel toooo settled.
This case can HELP.
First, a bit of background:
during the European Elections in May last year, thousands of EU citizens told us: