Here it is. The Monday VAR thread, offside special.

- What you're looking at / how it's done
- The true flaws in the system
- Why Mane offside correct (in process)
- Why law change made Van Dijk and Mane offside
- Upcoming automated offside
- PLUS: Pickford

It's long....
The first thing the VAR decides is the first point of contact of the pass on the ball.

Many scream about the frame rate without understanding the actual issue.

Frame rate doesn't mean it is not possible to make an accurate decision. However, it is inconsistent.
The correct frame for the first point of contact on the pass will almost always be clear to the VAR.

So when people say "that's not the correct frame, the ball has left the foot" it's not actually a problem of frame choice.

The problem is that the correct frame does not exist.
The VAR is presented by the Hawk-Eye RO with three consecutive frames to represent the first touch of the ball.

The VAR will choose one, and it will usually be obvious. But that frame may be "late", with the "correct" frame between frames.

Or it might actually be correct.
It's why, on some occasions, people question if the frame is correct. Has the ball already left the foot?

Put simply, if the previous frame is before the pass has begun it's not valid. The VAR has to choose the first frame when the pass has definitely begun.
So frame rate can be an issue, though I'd suggest it's not quite as unreliable as some claim.

Reports that there is a 12cm margin of error are only correct when you have a very fast player, running, AND the precise frame is not there.

There is NO consistent margin of error.
Now specifically onto the Sadio Mane offside, breaking it right down to show why it was the correct decision - based on the current use of technology.

Hopefully this is going to make it very clear. You don't have to like it, but it should explain it.
The key issue on both the Mane and Virgil van Dijk offsides was the change in the handball law.

An unintended consequence of the law change, to prevent fewer goals being disallowed and handball penalties, is that the attacker has been "extended" for offside.
"Armpit" offsides are now a thing of the past, because you can play the ball, and indeed score a goal as Gabriel did, with your upper arm.

So whereas last season the VAR would calculate to the armpit, it's now to the outer part of the upper arm (if furthest forward).
The handball law change has added a crucial new measurement point for offside, which we had not experienced yet this season but then got it twice in one game for Liverpool. And we will see it again.

The measurement point does remain subjective, as it is selected by the VAR.
One thing you should trust in this process is the crosshair lines, which are mapped to each pitch to create 3D imaging.

There are no wonky lines, they are not bent, they are not manipulated. They are computer generated to a set grid.

So how does it work?
The Hawk-Eye RO will, working with the VAR, first set which defender is furthest forward.

In the case of the Mane offside, the position of both Everton defenders were calculated with Yerry Mina shown to be furthest forward.

Then it's onto the attacker.
Remembering how the law has changed, offside has to be calculated to Mane's upper arm.

The line during the process is millimetres thick. This picture shows the calculation point, with the line correctly through Mane's upper arm.
The vertical line then thickens out to be the red dotted line, for broadcast purposes.

It is clear here but there are times like this when the angle is square to the incident, when the dotted line can get "lost" when it is shared across social media on low quality images.
The final VAR image was less clearer still, due to the red and blue lines converging.

This gave the impression that the red dotted line was not touching Mane, that there was a gap. This wasn't the case in the calculation.
There is definitely a subjective element at play here, because the VAR has to set the point on each player, and that may not be consistent.

However, that doesn't mean every decision has the same level of inconsistency.
In the case of Mane, because the calculation point was to an incredible small area at the top of his arm while standing straight there can only be a very small area of variation.

That can be different for, say, Van Dijk who had his arm outstretched.
The position of the Mane doesn't help here, visually. Perception on a 2D images can mislead.

As Mane is stood straight rather than leaning, and because it's his upper arm rather than his body, it gives the illusion, against the foot of Mina, that Mane is definitely behind.
So, to explain just how much of a difference the handball law change has made, here's both decisions calculated to last season's "armpit" rule.

Both Mane and Van Dijk well onside.

(Not official images of course)
But don't go thinking this is just happening in the Premier League.

Here is a goal disallowed for offside in La Liga on Sunday night. It's remarkably similar to Mane (and Van Dijk) with the attacker offside by the extended arm.
We've been told how the Premier League asked to have a margin of error in offside tech and it was denied by FIFA.

Well, in the Eredivisie this season it's the first season of this same offside tech.

Guess what? Yep, they are using the 10cm margin of error the PL wanted.
That 10cm margin of error is the lines touching, as the lines are each 5cm thick.

But the Eredivisie works with umpire's call, so in Liverpool's case they still would not have got a penalty on Van Dijk and the Mane decision is extremely borderline for the overturn.
Umpire's call doesn't remove all issues of course.

FC Twente had this goal disallowed by the linesman. It went to VAR, which showed the attacker was onside.

But as the lines were touching it stayed with the on field decision, and no goal was given despite the evidence.
So where do we go from here? Well, FIFA has set up a Technical Innovations department which has been working on semi-automated offside for some time, and trials were held at the Club World Cup.

The plan is for it to roll out in 2022 at the World Cup.
This semi-automated system will more accurately calculate the exact moment of the pass, rather than using frames, and map each player.

Offside will automatically be signalled to the VAR rather than requiring a 3-4 minute wait.

Not sure you will like this image.
The final decision will still be made by the VAR, as there remains subjective elements (such as the player being active) which a computer cannot calculate.

But this system would remove inconsistencies over the frame and crosshair calculation.
So, what happened with the Virgil van Dijk - Jordan Pickford incident. First of all, the VAR, David Coote, did identify a possible foul.

This much was clear purely by the review for a possible penalty and the offside check. He did not, however, review for a possible red card.
Last season, for me, the biggest VAR error was the failure to send off Giovani Lo Celso for a horror tackle on Cesar Azpilicueta.

The VAR on both occasions? David Coote.

The referee on both occasions? Michael Oliver.
I've always said that no matter what improvements or changes you make to VAR, it can only ever be as good as the referees making the decisions.

While you can say Oliver maybe should have seen both, Coote has the benefit of replays and failed to act in both.
Was he too busy concentrating on the possible offside decision, which would have led to a penalty, to fully consider the red-card challenge from Pickford?

Whatever the reason, he should have moved to the red after the offside but it was "check complete".
Final point on the Van Dijk offside. Some say the blue splodge is Calvert-Lewin's boot and the offside line is incorrect. Blue splodge is Joel Matip's boot, so the line is right.

Also, the calculation point is not the elbow. I've marked it with a yellow dot on the upper arm.
So, there are valid questions about *ultimate* accuracy with this offside tech. But it is considered the most accurate that is available.

The process is a lot more logical than may be made out. But hopefully now it makes some sense.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

17 Oct
Virgil van Dijk offside by the new point of handball on the arm, rather than the armpit.

Last season, this would have been onside.

Note the red line doesn't go to the elbow. It carries through and that's the calculation point.
#EVELIV
Clarification on Pickford/Van Dijk.... we all get one wrong now and then.

Pickford could have been sent off (probably should have been).

Had it confirmed that the VAR, David Coote, did NOT check for a red card. Appears he was too concerned with the offside. #EVELIV
The VAR, David Coote, should have checked there was a genuine attempt to play the ball by Jordan Pickford.

But after the offside was cleared, the check was complete and play restarted. There was no review for a possible red card against the keeper for the challenge. 🙄 #EVELIV
Read 5 tweets
16 Oct
Six months ago I started cycling to football grounds close by me.

Let's say it go out of hand, and recently I decided it was worth raising some money, for #TeamDementiaUK in memory of my father - who would have been 82 at the end of October.

3,750 miles later....
...and I'm 193 grounds down, 9 to go to complete every one within a 40-mile cycling radius of where I live.

3,750: miles cycled
182: football stadiums (every ground from Premier League to Level 11)
6: Racecourses of the south east
5: other grounds
9: to go

#TeamDementiaUK
If anyone is wondering what a 203-ground map of the south east looks like, here is it (coded by level).

North to @Harpenden_Town and @Ware_FC
South to @HorshamFC
East to @TheGillsFC and @Bowerspitseafc
West to @HartleyFC

google.com/maps/d/edit?mi…
Read 5 tweets
14 Oct
Huge win for Scotland tonight over Czech Republic, they now need two points from their last two games (away to Slovakia and Israel) to with their League B group.

Scotland a great example of why taking the Nations League seriously can take you forward.
If Scotland do win their group, they will be firm favourites to take one of the two World Cup playoff spots reserved for Nations League teams (if needed).

Added to that, their results in the Nations League have pushed them up to Pot 3 in next month's World Cup qualifying draw.
Denmark's win over England cements their place in pot 1 for the World Cup qualifying draw.

And with Switzerland getting a draw in Germany, and Netherlands drawing with Italy, it's going to very tight for the last places in pot 1.

The Dutch could face a group of death.
Read 6 tweets
14 Oct
Premier League Statement

All 20 Premier League clubs today unanimously agreed that Project Big Picture will not be endorsed or pursued by the Premier League, or The FA.

Shareholders agreed to work together as a 20-club collective on a strategic plan for the future. (cont)
The strategic plan is for the future structures and financing of English football, consulting with all stakeholders to ensure a vibrant, competitive and sustainable football pyramid. Clubs will work collaboratively, in an open and transparent process.
It will focus on competition structure, calendar, governance and financial sustainability. This project has the full support of The FA and will include engagement with all relevant stakeholders including fans, Government and, of course, the EFL.
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep
Ok, for the VAR thread this week I am going to fully explain the interpretation of defensive handball, as imposed this season.

DISCLAIMER: It doesn't mean I don't think some of these decisions are crackers, but this IS how referees AT ALL LEVELS have been told to apply the law.
I fully understand the frustration of highly experienced and respected former refs.

But the fact here is the application FIFA/the IFAB demands is not as it may seem in the written Laws of the Game.

Here's why. It comes down solely to the definition of "unnaturally bigger".
We all in our own minds, understandably, consider a "natural" arm position to have a direct correlation to how a player may be moving: jumping, running etc.

However, the handball law, as altered by IFAB boss David Elleray, does not take this into account whatsoever.
Read 23 tweets
26 Sep
I'm not sure what the Brighton players are complaining about. It's handball. It's a penalty. And Maupay knew it.

And another VAR first in the Premier League with the penalty given after the final whistle had been blown! #BRIMUN
Here is the section of the VAR protocol that sets out a penalty can be given after the final whistle has been blown. #BRIMUN Image
Excellent to see the tweak to the attacking handball law, which now must lead immediately to a chance, in action for the first time.

As the Kai Havertz handball led to an attempted clearance by a defender, not straight to Mount for the shot, no offence. #WBACHE
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!