Dear IUJ readers, another Journal Club coming! This October we will discuss the study from Diez-Itza et al. about factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair (shared link - rdcu.be/b8IEf ) - 1/11 - this is a thread
Factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair
Prepared by: Glaucia Varella, PT, MsC - on behalf of IUJ Social Media Scholar Group
Volume 31, issue 10, October 2020 - 2/11
-The authors mentioned the conservative treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. What are conservative options for treating pelvic organ prolapse? What is your experience with conservative treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in your clinical practice? 3/11
2-The present paper reports that anterior colporrhaphy is the most common procedure for treating the anterior compartment. Does this reflect the reality of your service? 4/11
3-The authors commented on the high rate of POP recurrence in their Introduction section. Discuss the risk factors involved in prolapse recurrence. 5/11
4-This is a prospective multicenter study. Comment on the pros and cons of a multicenter study compared to a single-center study. 6/11
5-Discuss how the primary outcomes “anatomic and symptomatic recurrence” were described. Do you agree with the criteria that patients must meet both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence in order to be classified as a recurrence? 7/11
6-The authors found that “preoperative POP-Q stages 3 and 4, levator avulsion, and hiatal area > 25 cm2 were independent risk factors for anatomic recurrence.” Explain when a variable is statistically called an “independent risk factor”? 8/11
7-Discuss the main findings of this paper. Are the recurrence rates found in the present study similar or different from your clinical practice?
9/11
8-The authors chose a cut-off point of -1 for the analysis of risk factors for recurrence of prolapse. Do you agree with this cut-off point and the justification for choosing that cut-off point presented by the authors? 10/11
9- What are the potential biases that can be found in this type of study design? How could these biases be controlled? 11/11
@threadreaderapp please enroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with IUJ - International Urogynecology Journal

IUJ - International Urogynecology Journal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IUJ_BlueJournal

2 May
Hello everyone! Here comes the first #IUJTweetorial from @IUJ_BlueJournal! The study will be "Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial", published last year. rdcu.be/b3NZO - 1/16
Healthcare in the US is expensive and quality care must be included in this package. It incorporates clinical outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction. The need of routine, in-person post-op visits is unknown. 2/16
▶️Telephone-based postop care provides safe and effective care with ⬇️ global scales.
▶️300k+ surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) each year in US
▶️Authors aimed a non-inferiority, RCT comparing routine postop outpatient clinic x telephone calls. 3/16
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!