<THREAD> 1. I just finished recording a video for @natsecaction. I had a lot more to say than they could realistically use. If you don't mind, I'd like to share why I think @JoeBiden will strengthen our national security as president.
2. I have worked on national security issues in Washington for almost 40 years, in and out of government. I have opposed the policies of many presidents, Democratic and Republican. But I have never said this:
3. The number one threat to the national security of the United States comes not from North Korea or Iran or China or Russia. It comes from the president of the United States. The threat comes from within the White House.
4. Every threat that Trump inherited he's made worse with his policies: pandemics, climate change, nuclear weapons, economic inequality, racial injustice. He is destroying the key pillars of our security: our treaties, our alliances, our reputation, our credibility, our economy.
5. Trump poses a unique and serious nuclear threat. He is mentally unstable, yet retains complete, unfettered authority to launch one or one thousand nuclear weapons within minutes. No one can countermand the order, thanks to our obsolete nuclear command and control mechanisms.
6. Joe Biden will change this. He won't just bring us back to "normal," he won't just be a sane, experience leader; he'll bring an expanded, integrated view of national security to the White House. He understands climate change, pandemics, global inequities are security threats.
7. Biden has pledged to end the forever wars, restore diplomacy as "the premier tool of our global engagement" and rebuild the State Department crippled under Trump. joebiden.com/americanleader…
8. With Biden and Sen. Harris in the White House we will never see another photo of a national security team that is all white men. They will bring the diversity of America to America's national security leadership, improving the quality of our discussions and decisions.
9. Biden and Harris will replace division with unity, go-it-alone with alliances, wild conspiracy theories with fact-based analysis, "fire and fury" with strength and decency, incompetent sycophants with a deep bench of seasoned professionals.
10. On nuclear policy, Biden will recommit to the Iran anti-nuclear deal to curb Iran's program; engage in real talks to stop North Korea's program; extend New START; and reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our strategy. But there'll be struggles in the new administration, too.
11. We will have to press them to cut the excessive Pentagon budget back to sustainable, pre-9/11 levels; to eliminate the obsolete ICBMs that are more danger than protection; to end the hammerlock defense contractors have over policy. But these are debates we can have - and win.
12. With @JoeBiden, @KamalaHarris, a Democratic Senate and House, we'll finally be positioned to modernize our security strategies, to strengthen our alliances, revitalize our diplomatic core and move funding from corrupted weapons program to programs that protect all Americans.
13. That is why I am doing all I can to elect Democrats to the White House, Senate and House. That's why I support Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Why do you support them?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the lesser bombshells in Bob Woodward’s new book is Trump’s brag that he has a secret new super weapon. I have some ideas about what he’s talking about - with the caveat that Trump often doesn’t know what he’s talking about and often just makes stuff up. 1/
Most likely, he means the “low-yield” warhead the Navy deployed on its strategic subs late last year. It is about a 5-kiloton yield (about 1/3 the size of the Hiroshima bomb and 1/30 to 1/90th the size of the warheads usually on the sub-launched missiles. theguardian.com/world/2019/jan…
Trump’s right that no one else has this weapon BECAUSE IT’S A STUPID IDEA. Listen to this @AtTheBrinkPod episode for more on why it’s idiotic to make nuclear weapons more usable, thus making nuclear war more likely. atthebrink.org/podcast/modern…
<Thread> I was not a fan of @JoeBiden. I favored @BernieSanders and @ewarren, who had specific plans for fundamental change, esp. in national security. But Biden has proved to be a strong, effective candidate. He’s united the party and adopted many, vital progressive policies. 1/
Discussions - even arguments - I had with my colleagues during the primaries revolved around how progressive policies could expand and mobilize the base vs. positioning on issues so as to win over Trump voters. It looks like Biden can do both. 2/
I see his strong appeal to moderate voters and the white working class. He’s cut Trump’s advantage there in half - while keeping and even improving on Clinton’s support among non-white voters and women and young voters. 3/ google.com/amp/s/www.usne…
<thread> There is no national security imperative for new US nuclear tests. We have almost 4,000 operational nuclear weapons. Enough to destroy the world 20x over. Here are some resources to help you understand how launching new nuclear tests makes us less secure. 1/
We've not tested a nuclear weapon since 1992. Since the India-Pakistan tests of 1998, the only other country to test has been North Korea. We have a global norm that Trump now wants to shatter . @ctbto_alerts is the go-to resource on nuclear testing. 2/ ctbto.org
<Thread> An important new development in the effort to redefine national security. “It is time to end our endless wars and adopt a new approach to international relations.” Over 50 groups demand we increase our security by cutting the Pentagon budget. 1/ huffpost.com/entry/antiwar-…
The most serious threats to our country are non-military and do not have a military solution, this broad coalition says. Read this excerpt from their letter. 2/
Donald Trump has increased the Pentagon budget by over $130 Billion in 3 years. Much of this is wasted. Much of the plan to build a new generation of nuclear weapons can be cut without risk, say the groups. 3/
One of the less reported aspects of Grenell’s placement as acting DNI is his demand to see all the “raw intelligence” behind the assessment that Russia is working to sabotage US elections. This has serious national security implications. 1/3
This is the tactic Steve Cambone used in the run up to the Iraq War when Cheney and Rumsfeld installed him in DOD to set up their own intel operation. He then cherry-picked raw, unvetted data to “prove” Saddam had WMD. He bypassed the usual intel community joint assessments. 2/3
Worse, raw intel will include sources and methods. Grenell will pass that to Trump who could share it with the Russians. Cambone never would have shared intel with our enemies, but Trump and Grenell don’t see Russia as an adversary, but an ally. 3/3
I have a short thread on the new, dangerous nuclear weapon that Donald Trump has just deployed. How "small" is it? How would we use it? Why did we make it?
First, get all the details here @FAScientists. They broke the news of the deployment ten days ago. The Pentagon admitted it just two days ago. fas.org/blogs/security…
Second, how small is it? 5 Kilotons. That is 5,000 tons of explosive force. It's 1/3 the size of the 15KT bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. The other sub warheads are 90KT (or 6x Hiroshima) or 455KT (30x Hiroshima). We have other air-dropped bombs that "small" but not on missiles.