NEW: President Trump has failed to deport “millions,” as promised. Local cops have all but made that impossible by refusing to cooperate with him. Instead he’s resorted to show-of-force ICE raids immigration activists say are tactics used to terrorize.
An ICE spokesman told me Trump's inability to deport more people than Obama is due in part to local law enforcement refusing to work with ICE, like here in L.A.
"The majority of [deportations] come from cooperation with state and local law enforcement partners," he said.
This is the place inside L.A. County Jail where ICE used to take into custody inmates who had finished serving their time -- including those whose charges were dismissed or committed minor offenses. @LACoSheriff kicked them out.
You can see clearly here that Trump won't even come close to Obama when it comes to first term deportation numbers.
To understand why, look at this data from @TRACReports and @ackocher, which clearly shows -- despite Trump trying to get law enforcement to cooperate with handing over undocumented people -- those requests are way down from the Obama years.
Our tour of the jail is new, as are the latest numbers from ICE and @TRACReports, but this issue has been one that local law enforcement, activists and elected officials have battled over for years, as @itscaitlinhd wrote about in 2017. nytimes.com/2017/09/13/us/…
As @MigrationPolicy makes clear, "deportation" is an informal term. "Removals" is the key stat, defined as "compulsory movement of a noncitizen out of the U.S. based on a formal order of removal," a far more consequential deterrence policy than "returns." migrationpolicy.org/article/obama-…
More on detainers in the Trump era here, from @crimmigration. This is the same @TRACReports data we cite in our report.
Right on cue, my point exactly. Trump ramping up interior enforcement (or at least PR for it) to send a message in another jurisdiction not cooperating with ICE.
Wrong, Chase. I literally talked to one of those families on Monday — 8 year old in CA (taken from his dad when he was 6) and father in Honduras trying to reunite — and will have audio of that interview on @NicolleDWallace’s show momentarily.
It cannot be possible @SpoxDHS is unaware there’s a status hearing tomorrow in the family separation case and the Trump admin and the ACLU are planning on discussing reunifications of still-separated families, can it? Who wrote this statement?
"People ask when we will find all of these families and, sadly, I can’t give an answer... will not stop looking until we have found every one... tragic reality is that hundreds of parents were deported to Central America without their children, who remain here,” said @leegelernt.
Most of these parents, if ever found, will face insurmountable hurdles to reunification with their children in the United States.
Why aren't we talking more about violence over Trump's border wall construction between the Border Patrol, U.S. Park Police and Indigenous protestors? Because too few are willing to do what @AliVelshi did today: go see what's happening with your own eyes. #Velshi@VelshiMSNBC
Here’s our complete report — which I’m grateful @AliVelshi played some of — on border wall construction and the profound impact it is having.
"New reporting reveals Trump administration officials intentionally separated migrant families. Broadcast and cable news largely ignored it. MSNBC was the only English-language network to devote substantial attention to the report." mediamatters.org/immigration/ne…
Here’s some of that reporting, with @NicolleDWallace, who always makes time on @DeadlineWH for developments in what is a story far from over. Kids are still separated.
I’m grateful, too, for @JoyAnnReid’s willingness to put family separations front and center. In this case it was minutes before our VP debate coverage.
Barrett is wrong. Separations aren’t a political/policy matter — they were deemed unconstitutional in federal court. Bush appointee Dana Sabraw halted wide-scale separations on grounds they violated Fifth Amendment due process rights. Said what Trump did “shocks the conscience.”
See chapter nine of my book. The title is straight out of the court case which stopped Trump’s wide-scale policy and ordered the reunifications of all families.
Judge Barrett to @SenBooker: “that’s been a matter of policy debate and you know, obviously, that’s a matter of hot political debate, in which I can't express a view or be drawn into as a judge.” wsj.com/livecoverage/a…