The GOP's electoral college advantage (gap between national polling averge & the tipping-point-state average) is ~ 4%:
On @FiveThirtyEight, national avg is Biden +10.3%
PA, the tipping-point-270 state is +6.4%
That means Dems need to win by at least 4% to squeak past 270.
We won't know final gap for a while, but this is a bigger gap than 2016, when Clinton won nationally 2.1%, but lost tipping-point states by > 1%.
One way to fix this gap by Congressional majority vote (and referenda):
Statehood for DC, Puerto Rico & North/South California
2/
3/ I meant " < 1%"
Anyway, keep a Federal District w/ 3 electors for the popular vote winner. (h/t @imillhiser)
That's 11 more electors.
The winner needs a majority of the new 549 = 275 (odd numbers are good)...
4/ The new tipping point = Wisconsin, currently +7% Biden. The new gap = 3%.
Bottom line:
One of many reasons to add states is to make the Electoral College less undemocratic.
Of all the ways to fix the Electoral College, this is one Congress can do by majority vote.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On @realTrumpcast w/ @page88, I said let's expand the Senate before the Court. Add at least 3 states: 1) DC 2) Puerto Rico 3) N & S California
Friends ask: "Can you really do that? By majority vote?"
Answer: The Founders did it!
KY, TN, etc...
Thread slate.com/podcasts/trump…
2) This is the first map of the United States, 1789-90.
Note Virginia, Massachusetts, Georgia, Connecticut "Western Reserve."
Those were formally giant states. Over the next few decades, Congress & their state legislatures split them up under Art IV, Sec 3 by majority vote.
3) In 1792, Congress added Kentucky from the western half of Virginia.
VA's legislature had already voted to release the land in the Articles of Confederation era, but Congress had not yet acted. Thus, the new Congress formally added KY as a new state out of an old one.
Watching FoxNews post debate.
"Trump bullied himself across the stage. Changed no one's minds."
"Biden had no car-crash moment, so that's a win for him."
"Muddled, no memorable moment. So not a win for Trump."
All of the FoxNews ads are for Amy Coney Barrett.
And Biden ads as the fiscally responsible candidate.
And home security ads.
And big pharma ads for medicating mental illness.
The @nytimes bombshell on the 2010 tax refund & IRS audit that followed:
"Starting in 2010 he claimed & received a refund totaling $72.9M. The legitimacy of that refund is at the center of the audit battle that he has long been waging, out of public view, with the IRS..."
@nytimes documents "square with the way Trump cites, without explanation, an ongoing audit as grounds for refusing to release his tax returns."
E.g.: July on @seanhannity@FoxNews: “They treat me horribly, the IRS, horribly.”
Tired:
Conservative mantra: "It all started with Dems blocking Bork."
Wired:
The turning point was Reagan nominating Bork, the Nixon official who executed the Saturday Night Massacre and in 1963 opposed the Civil Rights Act as "unsurpassed ugliness."
A non-mainstream extremist.
What today's conservatives don't admit:
1. Six Republicans voted No on Bork, including John Warner.
2. The Democratic Senate, which unanimously confirmed Scalia in 1986, then unanimously confirmed Anthony Kennedy... in 1988, during an election year.
Merrick Garland says hi.
Bork 1963 on Civil Rights Act:
"If I find your behavior ugly by my standards, moral or aesthetic, & if you prove stubborn about adopting my view, I am justified in having the state coerce you into more righteous paths. This is itself a principle of unsurpassed ugliness.”
For the record, in 2018, I preferred Amy Coney Barrett to Brett Kavanaugh, and that's before I ever heard about Dr. Blasey Ford.
For many reasons.
We all know what Barrett will do.
But Kavanaugh was careful about his abortion views until he was left off Trump's short list, and then he nudge-nudge/winked-winked his way to obvious anti-Roe signals in 2017 and got himself onto the top of the list. slate.com/news-and-polit…
But Kavanaugh's primary selling point was expanding presidential power, which is part of FedSoc ahistorical ideology and Trump's self-aggrandizing interests. His historical arguments are wrong, and their misuse is worse: slate.com/news-and-polit…
From 1992 to 2000, Dems will win the popular vote in SEVEN out of EIGHT pres elections...
but nominate only 4 of 9 Justices (counting RBG's seat).
How? 1) Electoral college 2) One party flips the Court (1968-88)... 3) Partisan Justices time their retirements 4) Luck...
Thread.
2/
Let's start with how partisan Justices time their retirements, but this is a chance to say something to honor Justice Ginsburg.
I was troubled by how many people, in just the hours after Ginsburg's death, commented not on her life's work, but on her "vanity" in death.
3/ I understand the criticism, but first, the timing was disrespectful.
Honor her life in the first 2 days after dying, especially during her high holiday Rosh Hashanah.
Criticize her after she is buried.
But there was an irony and even a hypocrisy about some of this critique.