If a Christian's understanding of politics is greatly shaped by the assumption that "taxation is theft," he or she ought to realize that such a view is quite novel, not just for the Protestant/Reformed tradition, but the history of global Christianity as a whole.
In reality, such an idea finds more commonality with Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment prioritization of the individual than any semblance of a biblical understanding of communal life and thriving.
Can taxation become a form of theft? Absolutely. But that is entirely
different from seeing taxation *inherently* as theft. A biblical understanding of communal life and thriving recognizes that there is a mutual responsibility of one to another that involves cost, time, and effort. Infrastructure and communal needs expand in proportion to the
size of a community because people are not living in hermetically sealed bubbles.
In fact, it has been a historically Christian understanding to work toward the common good of society and especially advocate for the most vulnerable in a community. The Reformation in many parts
of Europe had a robust "welfare" and taxation system that ensured that the infrastructural necessities were met and the most destitute had a safety net. Christians for millenia recognized taxation as a necessary means toward the common good.
In sum, can a Christian believe that
taxation is theft? Sure, but at the same time they should treat such a conviction with the humble recognition that it is fairly new to the Christian tradition. It should not be treated as though it is the way that faithful Christians have always thought regarding taxation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Which kids deserve to go to bad schools?" is a better and more piercing question to ask when it comes to the discussion of public school funding and school choice.
A holistic Christian pro-life ethic creates equitable opportunities for education and development for all children
within your sphere of influence. This ethic will seek to disrupt the current systems that were developed to propagate generations of inequity and prevent families from thriving.
Likewise, "Who deserves to have bad healthcare?" is the question that needs to be asked about
healthcare access and affordability in our country.
A holistic Christian pro-life ethic at the very least will seek to provide basic healthcare at free or affordable levels to all as a necessary expense for communal thriving. This ethic will creatively find ways for Christians
The Reformed confessions of faith state that the sine qua non of a faithful church are 1) faithful preaching of the Word, 2) administration of the sacraments, and 3) loving discipline.
Yet, in the history of the White American church, we have evidence that Christians invented
new doctrines (e.g. The curse of Ham), took literal pages out of Bibles they gave to slaves, and failed to preach texts that spoke of liberation and justice.
We have well documented evidence that Christians redefined baptism to allow slave holders to continue to enslave those
who became Christians, and the eucharist was celebrated in a segregated manner that completely went against the intent of the Sacrament.
We have clear evidence that the church failed to and/or refused to discipline those who were in the sin of slave holding and partiality
On numerous occasions, I've heard Christian leaders talk about how "people are changing the definition of racism" that's "different from what we grew up with." The "new definition," they argue, comes from Critical Race Theory/Marxism/liberalism, and therefore is bad.
The problem is that we don't do this with nearly any other sin. "Sexual immorality" from a previous generation has had to be defined more expansively to include the changing dynamics and influx of nearly ubiquitous porn, the recognition of sex trafficking and sex slavery,
as well as systems, laws, and policies that tend toward sexual licentiousness.
Likewise, our understanding of murder has had to be expanded and reshaped to include ethical questions such as abortion, euthanasia, and any systems that may tend toward unjust death.
There is an important difference between a hypothetical Christian liberty when it comes to political convictions and practical boundaries defined by love.
While Christians are free to hold a diversity of political views, they are at the same time not free under the rule of...
love to hold any political view that tends toward a systemic lack of love of neighbor.
This is why every Christian must be provisional constituents of any political party and must be the first of any demographic to speak against their own political group when it goes astray.
Christians who are so at home with a political camp are truly not at home with their highest allegiance to the kingdom. Kingdom ethics cuts through every platform and policy and is no respecter of parties.
The church must emphasize both Christian liberty and the bounds of...
Defining "justice" only by its negative and delimiting aspects (e.g. upholding the law, punishing evildoers, restricting evil) results in a deeply deficient view of the role of governing authorities.
"Justice" according to the Bible not only has negative aspects but it also has
positive aspects. Justice is giving people what they are due as imagebearers. It is to promote flourishing and shalom. It is to make straight that which is crooked. It is to be a support and succor to the most vulnerable.
We must affirm both the negative and positive aspects of
justice for it be justice at all, biblically speaking. Half of justice is an injustice.
Therefore, when we affirm that the Bible sets a vision of justice to be upheld by governing authorities, we must realize that this includes both bearing the sword and lifting up the
Real divisiveness is any attempt to rebuild the wall of hostility between peoples that Christ tore down.
Racism, White supremacy, and White nationalism are ultimately theological and demonic attempts to undo the work of Christ.
Silence and inaction is floating in its current.
Fighting against those who fight against anti-gospel principalities of racism is playing into the devil's hand, who knows he cannot thwart God's ways but seeks to divide God's people and make them bite and devour one another rather than bear faithful witness in this world.
There is a time for disagreement and debate about policies, procedures, and the best way forward. But the telos of these conversations is to meet the urgent need of casting light into the darkness of White supremacy that holds many captive. Pious and studious inaction is...