Something I keep thinking about is that coronavirus could have been a huge gift to Trump and the Republicans. They act like it was his 2008 financial crisis, but really it was more like 9/11 - something that could have boosted their favorability in exchange for very little work.
All they had to do was nothing - stand back, let the CDC take the lead, use the playbook Obama left them, and take credit at the end. Hell, even Kushner's testing plan was apparently pretty solid before it was abandoned because they thought the virus would only hit blue states.
And it's not as if they didn't know how bad things were going to get. Republican senators were selling their stocks. Trump himself, we now know, was telling people how dangerous the disease was.
But instead of taking very simple, mostly low-maintenance steps that would have paid off enormously in terms of favorability - not to mention lives saved - they opted to ignore the disease and hope it would go away. I don't get it.
I know that Trump is stupid and that Republicans are ideologically opposed to making the lives of Americans better. I know that they're racists and the way coronavirus hit POC communities left them at best indifferent. But I still can't understand this decision.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Haven't seen anyone talking about #Helstrom. Which is good, because it's a really unimpressive show. But it also means I have no one with whom I can share my awe at Hulu somehow managing to capture all the weaknesses of the Netflix MCU shows, and none of the strengths.
I had problems with Hulu's Runaways, but it at least had its own style. #Helstrom is just the Netflix MCU special: vague and roundabout plotting, difficulty establishing stakes, annoying characters, and - most of all - murky, boring visuals.
The one thing #Helstrom has going for it is the character of Ana. It's pretty clear to me that the show should have been rewritten with her as its focus - she has the more interesting story, and the more dynamic personality.
Not quite sure how to feel about this week's #LovecraftCountry. Taken on its own it's a strong hour, anchored by a fantastic Jamie Chung, who's never been less than magnetic in anything I've seen her in. Someone give her a show already.
But as part of the ongoing story of #LovecraftCountry, it feels like an odd fit. Are we just supposed to handwave the fact that Tic is apparently a war criminal? Is this something the show is going to revisit, or is it in the past?
The episode does such a great job of putting us in Ji-Ah's point of view that we end up alienated from Tic. To the point that her forgiveness of him feels unearned. "We're both monsters, so it's OK" is a really glib way of addressing the things he's done. #LovecraftCountry
Wait, so "pretend that we can make it 2019 again by wishing really hard" turned out *not* to be viable business strategy? I am shocked and amazed! theatlantic.com/culture/archiv…
I realize this might be hard to believe given everything on the news right now, but most people aren't stupid. They're not going to risk getting and spreading a deadly disease just to see a movie that's going to be on VOD in three months.
It probably didn't help that Tenet had lukewarm reviews and that WB already tried its "knowing even the slightest thing about this movie will ruin the experience completely" strategy with Interstellar and it turned out to be bunk. But mostly, people aren't going to the movies.
So JK Rowling’s latest Cormoran Strike book (which is 900 pages long! WTF!) is apparently about a trans serial killer. I think we all knew this was coming, though I personally thought that lead times would put this plotline off until book 6.
This has caused people to bring up The Silence of the Lambs, which feels like an excuse to talk about my increasingly complicated feelings towards it.
(This discussion is of the book, not the film, which is a faithful adaptation but misses the book’s point in several key ways.)
Silence has been one of my favorite books since I was a young girl, but it is undeniably transphobic, unfortunately in ways that can’t be disentangled from its core theme and strong feminist subtext.
Continuing with the Dune theme, I've decided to rewatch the 2000 miniseries. I remembered being pretty meh about it, and it only took 3.5 minutes to remember why. A definite "but I was going into Tosche station to pick up power converters" vibe about this version of Paul.
The special effects paradox: CGI from 2000 looks worse and less believable than practical effects from 1984.
I approve of this version's choice to beef up Irulan's role, but I'm not sure "giant paper fans decorated with fake butterflies" was the right way to get us to take her seriously.
Everyone kept telling me that this was the WRONG version, so I've tracked down a copy of Lynch's original. So instead of watching the last 1h15m of the Smithee version, I'm going to watch 2h15m of the Lynch version. Yay?
(By the way, for everyone complaining about "A Alan Smithee Film", it's very clear that they just replaced Lynch's name in this frame and didn't bother to replace the preposition because that would change the centering.
One obvious advantage of this version: more doggos!