A thread on how most real estate folks structure deals with outside investors.

Most GPs utilize the "preferred equity" structure when they raise money from outside investors. They "syndicate" deals.

Here's the basics:
The person (or team of people) putting the deal together is the "sponsor". Also called general parter. Referred to on twitter as the GP.

They find the property, do all the work, hire the management company and take fees. They often co-sign debt and always secure the financing.
The investor is generally passive, doing no work and putting in cash. This is the "limited partner". Referred to on twitter as the LP.

They don't co-sign debt. They simply read reports and ask the sponsors questions and cash checks every month (if the deal is going well).
There are two equity classes.

"Preferred equity" belongs to the LPs. Cash talks, so this is a higher class of shares. They are first in the "capital stack" behind the debt (bank loan).

"Common equity" belongs to the sponsor. They are generally last in the capital stack.
Sponsors generally co-invest. That means they hold both equity classes. A 10% co-invest is standard.

That means the GP has skin in the game. His 10% co-invest makes him both an LP and a GP.
The preferred equity LPs have comes with a preferred return. Often called a "pref".

That means they get paid first. The pref signals how much. Its generally 6-12%. That means the LP is entitled to the first 6-12% of profit the project generates.
The lower the pref the better for the sponsor. Generally lower risk projects can warrant a lower preferred return for the LPs.

New development, or high risk value add projects, generally warrant lower prefs and higher "promotes"
The "promote" is how the sponsor gets paid. Its often called "carry" or "carried interest".

Its a percentage of profits the sponsor gets AFTER the LPs get their preferred return on their cash.

This ranges from 20% to 50%. It can change based on checkpoints, or "waterfall".
Sponsors have different strategies, but most try to return LP capital as soon as possible either through a sale or refinance.

Because every day your LP capital isn't returned its accumulating "preferred returns" that you owe to the LP. The only way to stop it is to return it.
Then you're in waterfall land and you can get 20% or 50% of profits from there on out.

There are often additional waterfalls. 80/20 after an 8 pref and 50/50 after a 20% "hurdle".

A hurdle is a return percentage you need to hit to get into the next level of promote.
"IRR" is the gold standard for a lot of LPs.

Internal Rate of Return.

When the deal is done, and my capital is back, what percent return have I earned?

Sponsors hate it because there are so many other factors that are more important to the health of the deal.
Then there is the "hold period".

How long of a time frame are we on? These deals aren't liquid. LPs can't just ask for their money back.

Sponsors lay out the investment timeline and let everyone know how long this thing is expected to go.
There are also acquisition fees and AUM (assets under management) fees charged by most sponsors.

Acquisition fees can be anywhere from 1-5%.

AUM fees are generally .5-2%.

The market sets these fees (as well as the pref and promote). If you have a track record, more fees.
Lets do an example deal here to paint the picture.

I buy storage facilities so lets say we have a $1MM operational facility already at 90% occupancy.

Its (relatively) low risk so lets say the structure is 7 pref and 50% promote thereafter. No waterfalls.
We bank finance 70% or $700k. Thats first in the capital stack. If things go sideways the bank gets paid first.

We raise 300k from outside LPs to close out the deal. No co-invest to keep the math simple.

Starting on day 1 we owe the LPs a 7% annual rate (pref) on the $300k.
Lets say we have a 5% acquisition fee.

I would get paid $50k on day one to buy the deal and get it under ownership.

To keep the math simple we aren't building this in, but keep it in mind.

The 1% AUM fee would be $3,000 a year on the $300k.

That goes to the sponsor.
We buy it at a 8 cap, meaning NOI is 8% of the overall purchase price, or $70k.

Our cash on cash would be around 15% or higher if we can secure Interest Only debt (not paying principle for the first period of time).

That means on day one I'm hitting the hurdle and getting paid
The first 7% goes to the LPs, or $21k a year.

But we have $45k in cashflow, or $24k after the pref.

That money is split 50/50 between the GP and the LPs because we have a 50% promote.

Yr 1 the LPs get $21k+$12k for $33k. 11% IRR pace.
But the sponsor has a plan to add value. They raise NOI from $70k to $100k over 12 months.

Yr 2 cashflow is even higher, $45k+$30k for $75k.

LPs are owed $21k as their pref and we have more to split up between the sponsor and LPs. LPs get another $27k and Sponsors get $27k.
But here comes the cash-out-refinance or sale.

Lets do a sale first. Our property might be worth a 7 cap on the new NOI, or $1.428MM. Lets say $1.5 for simple math.

We sell it for $1.5M at the 24 month mark. Home run deal.
Lets go down the capital stack and pay the pipers:

Bank gets their $700k back first.

LPs get their $300k back next.

They've already been getting their pref from day 1 so we don't have a preferred return to "catch up" when we sell. So its 50/50 from here.
Sponsor gets $250k, LPs get $250k. Boom baby!

In 24 months the LPs made $81k in cashflow (or 13.5% per year).

That means the targeted cash yield on the deal should have been around 13.5% if the sponsors projections were correct. Cash yield doesn't account for sale, only ops.
At closing the LPs got a check for $550k ($300k was return of capital) and they made $81k in cashflow.

A $331k total profit. In 2 yrs.

IRR: 55.16%
Equity Multiple: 2.1x

Add it to your resume, pay a bunch of taxes, and do a bigger deal!
But heres the magic trick - the cash-out-refinance.

Instead of selling the property for $1.5MM and paying a bunch of taxes and being stuck with $500k in capital that is earning nothing and needs re-deployed, lets hold the asset and put more debt on it.
Banks don't care what you paid for an asset. They care about how much money it makes.

They get the property appraised for $1.5MM, look at the debt service coverage ratio, and agree to lend 75% of the new value.

That means you can take $1,125,000 in new debt.
Lets pay the piper, in order of the capital stack:

Bank gets paid $700k (original debt is cleared).

LPs get paid $300k (original investment, pref is no longer accruing)

You have $125k left over. Sponsor gets 50%. LPs get 50%.
You've returned all the capital.

EVERYTHING FROM HERE IS BUTTER.

The property still cashflows. You didn't pay a bunch of taxes. You still got LPs their money back and they're ready to do another deal with you.

You as the sponsor, now own 50% of a building you put $0 into.
You get to put a little sign like this next to the IRR section on your resume:
Disclosure:

I'm not a pro at this. Looking forward to getting corrected where I missed something.

There are thousands of ways to do this and terms and factors I didn't mention.

I just wish I could have read something like this a year ago when I first started on ReTwit.
Also this is a good site to look at deals, explore structures, and learn about different aspects of real estate private equity:

crowdstreet.com
And reporting, calculating, distributing is all complicated, especially with 5+ LPs in a deal.

I use @GroundbreakerCo to manage my LPs. Same thing as Juniper Square except 1/5 the cost. Love it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Huber

Nick Huber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sweatystartup

22 Oct
A thread on how to turn $100 into a lot more:

People are spending a lot of money on their homes right now. Its time to go get some of that money and help out some of these people.

Sound silly? Good.

It really is this simple sometimes.

Lets go 👇
Get on your computer and buy a web domain.

Get a freelancer (upwork or fiverr) to make you a logo/flyer and get $45 worth of flyers printed at your local print shop.

Buy a box of sidewalk chalk if you really want to grind and get gritty.
Go downtown with the sidewalk chalk and write “pressure washing and home cleaning 888-555-1234” as many times as you can in high traffic areas.

Go to a middle class or high end neighborhood and hand out flyers on porches and wherever else.
Read 15 tweets
22 Oct
The “buy low, sell high” mentality in real estate is NOT the way to generate serious wealth.

Yes, you can get rich. And yes its SEXY and that exit IRR looks great on pitch decks and resumes.

But it’s a TERRIBLE way to build long term, low risk, passive wealth.

A thread:
Sam Zell made bank. I know.

Chamath makes money investing in unicorns while the avg guy with “VC” in his twitter bio doesn’t.

Day traders make $ too. So do house flippers.

Until a lever gets pulled somewhere in the fragile system and something out of their control happens.
And taxes and transaction costs.

The gov takes 15% of your nut. The brokers take 5% of overall transaction which can be 10 or 15% or your nut. Closing costs, transfer taxes, the list goes on.

Every time you sell 30%+ of your nut is EVAPORATES.
Read 17 tweets
21 Oct
My most popular tweets on real estate, self storage and entrepreneurship.

A thread...
The key concepts around real estate private equity so you know what the folks in ReTwit are talking about:

My own philosophy on business, opportunity, competition, and why I think the media is leading a lot of folks in the wrong direction:

Read 11 tweets
21 Oct
It takes a long time (and a lot of consistent work) to build a following.

I’ve put out two episodes a week for nearly two years on The Sweaty Startup podcast.

If you want to podcast to make money, do something else.

If you want to learn a ton about yourself, give it a shot.
I make about $200 a month from a bluehost affiliate link on my site, $200 in YouTube ad revenue, $1000 or so from my LaunchKits sponsorship.

I spend about 2 hrs a week and pay $500 a mo to my producer.

The network has been amazing. I get 20+ emails a day from strangers.
But the real value is in what I’ve learned.

By teaching it and organizing my thoughts I am 5x as confident and much better at making decisions.

It has accelerated my own career, for sure.
Read 5 tweets
20 Oct
I It’s easy for me to tweet about how easy business is.

I started on 3rd base with a massive safety net.

This stuff is hard. And without the stuff in this thread it’s risky or damn near impossible.
My dad sat me down and taught me how to run my lawn biz at age 13. P&L, billing, etc.

He gave me my first 5 clients. And a mower. I went to college in 2008 with $40k in the bank.

No mortgage, bills, and was on my parents health insurance when we started Storage Squad in 2011.
I was a student. My parents paid my rent. No pressure to earn.

I had the cash to buy that first $1500 cargo van.

My partner and I lived for free in his family’s house for first 9 mo.

My girlfriend (now wife) paid the rent until 2014. She had our health insurance until 2017.
Read 6 tweets
19 Oct
Disagree.

You can be profitable from day one. I was. Bootstrapping is the way.

Everybody thinks entrepreneurship is super risky.

I think it’s more risky being an at-will employee.

Would you rather have a few hundred customers or one boss deciding your fate?
When I started I was going to school 20 hrs a week, studying another 10, D1 Track & Field another 30 AND I had just met my wife and was building a relationship with her.

You can make time for anything if it’s important enough to you.

You don’t need to quit your job.
And I had very little money and my parents didn’t invest a dollar in my company.

We were RESOURCEFUL and found a way to get started by trading our time for money.

Nobody is willing to do that part because it isn’t fun and it isn’t described in the entrepreneurship books.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!