This is unavoidably true. And so a lot of people who don’t see it yet will, in time.
To be more precise, I should have said “with time,” not “in time.” The “in time” part is in doubt … though I’m working on it.
The explanation — the *real* explanation — is that John Roberts & his fellow conservatives on the court are as hostile to democracy as the Republicans who appointed them, and want to help those Republicans govern via minority rule by white conservatives.

This is why Republicans pass laws to make it harder to vote.

This is why Republican-appointed judges gutted the Voting Rights Act and continue changing the rules to make it harder to vote.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jamison Foser

Jamison Foser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jamisonfoser

23 Oct
The New York Times’ political coverage is bad, folks.
Not just in the article — she’s the lede!
The NYT should retract that article. But it should also publicly explain the process by which it came to portray a GOP campaign consultant and a GOP official as regular swing voters.

How did @elainaplott make contact with them? Did a GOP flak set it up? Did she research them?
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
Trump’s gonna get through the first twelve minutes without using a racial slur and reporters will write their “new tone” ledes, which they will refuse to reconsider over the next hour.
and the day ends the way it was always fated to end ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
21 Oct
I’m reminded of 2007, when much of the news media (particularly Chris Matthews) wouldn’t shut up about the danger of “drama” and “distraction” due to unfaithful Bill Clinton returning to the WH if Hillary won.

Meanwhile, Rudy Giuliani was also running and got ~none of that.~
When Giuliani ran for president he had been thrice-married, once to his cousin, had separated from his wife via press conference and moved out of the mayor’s mansion, and his wife sought a restraining order to keep his mistress from entering the mansion.

Media ignored it all.
Which … ok. Except that simultaneously, they were obsessing about Hillary Clinton’s *husband’s* infidelity and whether that would pose a distraction if she won.

Which is an extremely obvious and extremely sexist double standard.
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
Here come the elites to make sure there are no consequences for elites. 🙄
Nixon: Pardoned.

Reagan/Bush: Iran-Contra successfully covered up in part because of pardons

Bush II: let’s look forward, not back at torture, lying into war

Y’all, I’m not sure “let’s just move past Republican wrongdoing and let history judge them” creates good incentives.
Things are shitty now in part because whenever Republican presidents dabble in fascism, media and political elites quickly insist on letting them off the hook, stupidly certain that the fever has broken and it’s time to unite.
Read 5 tweets
17 Oct
This is true.

The media also doesn’t want to admit that this is in part due to decades of incitement by conservatives and Republicans that the news media treated as the equivalent of Patty Murray or Dick Durbin.

Michelle Mallon wrote In Defense of Internment; cable bookers put her on TV. Pat Buchanan praised Hitler; CNN and MSNBC both hired him. CNN hired Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs, too. (Trust me I have a million examples.)
On any given weeekend for the last 30 years there have been more racists on the Sunday shows than black people.
Read 4 tweets
16 Oct
Blockbuster new study from @TakeBacktheCt: Republican-appointed judges voted to make it harder to vote ***80 percent of the time***

nytimes.com/2020/10/16/us/…
This is not an accident: Republicans have illegitimately seized control of the judiciary specifically so they can use the judiciary to destroy democracy, because they know they are a minority party.

Republican-appointed judges have voted to weaken democracy an astounding 80 percent of the time, according to this new study.

Incredibly, Trump-appointed judges are even more anti-democracy: 85 percent of the time.

Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!