“Hindu public having belief in God and faith in temple worship is a religious denomination” definition of Kerala HC full bench best reflects the reality on 26th Jan 1950 when our Constitution with Art 26 protection was adopted with equal protection for all
SC a creature of Constitution using its interpretative power effectively has interpreted religious denomination in a way that in practice inserted an exception into Art 26 wording denied Art 26 protection selectively to the Hindu Temple Worship Sampradaya
Changing defn of Religious denomination which included Hindu Temple Worship Sampradaya “Hindu public having belief in God and faith in temple worship is a religious denomination” on 26th Jan 1950 changes Hindu Temples Religious Character bared u Sec 4
Changing defn of Religious denomination which existed on 26th Jan 1950 in a manner Religious sampradaya “Hindu public having belief in God and faith in temple worship is religious denomination” to which Hindu temples belonged no longer exists is Judicial conversion bared u Sec 4
That changing the defn of Religious denomination which existed on 26th Jan 1950 in a manner Hindu temples belonging to "Hindu public having belief in God and faith in temple worship is religious denomination" is renamed as a Secular temple is a conversion by the Secular State.
Hindu temple worshippers were religious denomination along with Christians, Jews and Mahomedans worshippers (below extract from 1828 Missionary Gazetteer)and all equally got Art 26 rights on 26th Jan 1950 but Hindu temple worshippers alone lost this right
As per the 1904 judgement quoted by SC Ayodhya judgement the pious purpose of religious denomination of Hindu temple worshippers donations and the donated land etc. vested in the legal personality of a Hindu Deity. On 26th Jan 1950 this became constitutionally protected u Art 26.
The pious purpose of Hindu Deity incarnation is to teach us to perform sacred acts for Protection of Dharma👇protect pious purpose of our sacred acts till existence of Sun, Moon and Universe for Protection by Dharma. Art 26 protects this pious purpose in Deity legal personality
Pious purpose of "Hindu public having belief in God (Deity) and faith in Temple worship is a religious denomination" (Kerala HC full bench) who belong to all communities is protected in the legal personality of a Hindu Deity under Art 26 expl wide support
Pious purpose of "Hindu public having belief in God (Deity) and faith in Temple worship is a religious denomination" (Kerala HC full bench) ancestors who belong to all communities and sacrificed in Swami Vivekananda's words is protected in the legal personality of a Hindu Deity.
Over thousands of years every community established temples and donated properties in the form of Daanapatram in the name of our Hindu Deities and Art 26 protects the pious purpose of the entire devotee community in the legal personality of a Hindu Deity.
While Hindus in neighboring countries lost fundamental rights requiring CAA, Hindu Deities lost Art 26 right which protects the pious purpose of Deity and Devotees belonging to Hindu Temple Worship sampradaya from external Secular State & PIL activists.
While Hindus in neighboring countries lost fundamental rights due to partition, Hindu Deities who had fundamental rights above Kings in princely kingdoms lost their fundamental rights due to merger to form Bharath and SC Sabarimala interpretation that Hindu Deities have no rights
Shri @PandalaKottaram members of Lord Ayyappa family spearheaded the struggle for Lord Ayyappa Deity rights and also secured the promise from Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji on April 18th 2019 on Deity Rights protection
"Currently, the Deity does not have any rights over His temple. Article 26 Rights need to be conferred in the Deity so that His customs, traditions and practices (sampradaya) are protected and cherished,”
The Spiritual pious purpose of devotees life belonging to Hindu Temple Worship Sampradaya continues to live on even after the death of body and it is important to reclaim constitutional protection through Art 26 rights for legal personality of Hindu Deity
After seven decades of Independence one honest devout officer in 2015 had to give GO educating other Govt officers that temple lands are not Govt lands shows the lack of protection for pious purpose of ancient donors of temple lands situation is similar in many States not only AP
Today 18th Oct 3 months since July 18th letter of Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn on importance of following Dharma. SC held Hindu Deities (Dharma) have no Constitutional rights => Constitution doesn't protect Dharma sacrificing protection of Dharma
Lord Hanuman who is worshipped as our Acharya has given us the path of securing protection of Dharma lost post adharmik Sabarimala judgement in the form of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn who was approached by Hindu Deities through July 18th letter as a representative of Nation's Dharma has also referred the matter of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification to the Ministry of Home Affairs through his dharmik guidance
26th Jan 1950 when Constitution came into force all Hindu temples belonged to Religious denomination of Hindu public having belief in God and faith in temple worship w Art 26 protection. Today most temples are u Secular Govt control without Art 26 protection how did this happen ?
While the SC took great care to preserve its independence by interpreting Art 124 it did the opposite in case of interpretation of the term 'religious denomination' diluting Art 26 protection for Hindu Temple Worship Sampradayas as explained by @trramesh pgurus.com/how-hindus-are…
SC a creature of Constitution used its interpretation power to rewrite Art 26.
The cumulative effect of series of SC judgements is that Art 26 protection is unavailable for majority Hindu temples paving the way for their conversion to secular temples under Govt control.