Looking at the usual rehearsed hot takes about hungry children and families and thinking: people love to judge others levels of personal resourcefulness and to imply that they would know 'ten simple tricks' to solve the problem as if being in need were a failure of imagination
Hot takes around poverty are absolutely dripping with survivorship bias, as are any discussions of need where there is a notion that personal coaching can overcome systemic inequality. People literally only listen to the experiences of those who overcame, not those who cannot
People with their hot poverty takes absolutely adore valourising their own life hacks while suggesting that other people's attempts to get by are silly, misguided and morally reprehensible. Yes, your way of getting through worked for you but there were loads of people that didn't
So with poverty 'life hacks', so with apocalyptic survival. Authoritarian people love the idea that given any form of hardship, they'd have the personal resourcefulness to survive. The rest of us kind of realise it takes a mesa of help to make it through things *together*
If you have a full belly and warm home, your advice that people should be more like you doing things that you actually never have to do because your belly is full and home warm, you are just bigging yourself up, not helping anyone at all. You are just saying need is illegitimate
So much of the discourse around voting to not provide free meals for kids basically amounts to people saying 'if my kids were hungry I would feed them'. Which is just ignoring the problems other people have while robustly mouthing off. Which is a strong British trait
There is a brutality to British public life and attitudes to need, poverty and lack of essentials. People who talk about how they 'made it through and why can't others' want an outside authority to pat them on the head and say 'well done'. To be given dignity they'll take others
Because class is so ingrained in British life, people are quite prepared to throw other people who are struggling to the wolves if it means someone more comfortable than them pats them on the head and says 'well done for not costing me anything, you're almost like one of us'
When people have their hard hot takes about poverty they are valourising struggling, as if having lived through horrible times at great cost was a more valuable idea than preventing others living through horrible times at great cost. Like: there's no medals for bad times, chief
It's horrible to see people who have experienced horrible, life limiting, soul destroying poverty arriving at arguments that amount to 'the only way I can gain and hold self respect from my awful experience is to argue that others should go through it too.'
I'm sorry that hard times were hard for you in the past and well done getting through them. I see and hear you. But I think you're wrong to wish that on others so that they can know how you felt. I can't make up for what you didn't have, but we can stop the cycle together
Having made it through poverty and limited chances to a degree of comfort is an achievement. But other people didn't make it through, and won't make it through in future. Privatising the idea of survival down to personal traits might make you feel more secure, but it doesn't help
British society is so unequal one thing people fear is having their self respect taken away. People who struggled and survived can be so terrified of having that achievement unrecognised they'll argue for others to go through hardship so their achievement isn't forgotten
It's a testament to how unequal British society is that people will literally argue about who is better at being poor when confronted with reality of other people's struggles to have a life and feed their family. People love to claim they were the deserving poor and others aren't
Literally, hot takes after MPs voted down extending free meals for kids amount to 'back when I was poor I was mint at it and totally aced it and all of you currently poor people are just noobs and I was the winner of being poor and now I'm not so there'
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just thinking about what it means to have brain/mind that goes wrong and weird situation of being able to examine my own thoughts and perceptions objectively. It's such a weird thing to be able to 'see' clearly where my thinking has gone wonky when I'm no longer in a wonky place
Sometimes I feel bullish about it and sometimes I feel a kind of deep, sorrowful shame when looking back at my own mistakes of thinking and perceiving. It feels like realising I've only been half listening to a conversation and just fabulated what I thought was being said.
Actually, shame is probably the most obliterating internal state for me. When in the throes of an attack of shame, all of my most useful skills and thinking just disappear. I give in, I give up, I give others far more space inside me than I should. That's one of gaps I fall into
This is worth a look about the physical/mental split in ideas of mental ill-health in Western cultures. I kind of feel like there's still a lot to be found out about physical causes and social causes and political causes. I don't think everything is just social environment
I say this because brains are also physical organs. I'm thinking about head trauma and mood, about things that crate changes in the brain. I feel like the medication / therapy / social justice axes are super useful, but the debate slices up challenges in the wrong ways
I also think medicine (and society) has problems with any thing that makes someone 'ill' but which doesn't have a direct physical sign. I'm thinking of chronic pain, for example. There's been a shift away from medication for chronic pain, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist
This makes me think about how 'end of history' the war on benefits claimants stuff from 2007 or so onward feels. The idea that everything was going so well that unemployment was a psychological problem rather than a practical one; using benefits to teach people lessons
When you look at it from a decade or more of distance; 'no rights without responsibilities'; 'reciprocity and obligation' social security clipboard wonk ideas of couple of years prior to the Financial Crash just carried over into the unholy mess of benefits policy that followed
The idea that need for benefits was somehow a symptom of people's own psychology and not their position within society came at high point of economic growth, as if the next horizon for social policy was the perfectibility of people. But that thinking stuck and grew and multiplied
I was at a health conference once and I was talking to this bloke about Bill Gates style moonshots in health and eradicating diseases and he said that it didn't matter how many nets you sent if the government didn't care enough about poor people
His main point was that healthcare only works if those that rule care enough about the people they rule, other wise all of the money you tip into a problem just ends up making those on power safer and more comfortable
He said he'd worked in and around big Ebola outbreak and reckoned there were two reasons that moved the science on so quick. 1st was sheer panic and relaxing of some protacols in research but other was that the disease was unknown and rich people feared it as much as poor people
Been thinking a little bit about the UK, as you might expect, and what now means. One of my first observations is we often fetishise the means of making people's lives good and fulfilling, while ignoring the fundamental entitlement to those good and fulfilling lives
Like, we talk about train fares and renationalisation, not how amazing it would be to travel cheaply and efficiently. We talk about council homes and rental deposits without talking about how everyone deserves a sitting room, a room to have hobbies in, a secure front door
We talk about economy, not the results of the economy. We talk about money in your pocket not wonderful things outside your window or at end of your street. We talk mostly about what people should settle for, not what they have every right to expect. In short we talk of policy
I'm going to be doing bit of live tweeting today from #nsunagm19 and I'll also be speaking as well. Sarah Yiannoullou is introducing herself and saying she is happy to announce @AkikoMHart as her replacement. Akiko is now introducing herself to everyone and thanking Sarah