Ratcliffe also says "Russia has access to voter information" (as it is public and easy to obtain), but after spending minutes describing the disturbing Iranian operation, doesn't really explain anything else we're seeing related to Russian influence campaigns.
This paints a confusing picture to the non-expert, IMO; it looks like "Iran did this horrible thing, Russia has some files."
Meanwhile, we know Russia has been interfering in political processes around the world for over a decade. Its US operations never stopped after 2016.
(If you're interested in learning more about Russian ops elsewhere, I wrote a book about it: bloomsbury.com/us/how-to-lose…)
The intel community's public assessments of foreign interference this election cycle have all given short shrift to Russia; we saw this with an initial notification about interference activities in July which placed China above Russia dni.gov/index.php/news…
And DNI Ratcliffe made the bizarre decision to declassify unverified intel about the 2016 election in what seemed to be a political move nytimes.com/2020/10/09/us/…
All of this amounts to an environment of distrust, unfortunately. When the American people are being briefed about ongoing threats to this election, I would prefer to not have to read between the lines of official announcements like a Soviet Kremlinologist.
The American people should trust that they're getting the full picture on foreign interference, not one viewed through a political lens meant to meet political ends. Sadly, that isn't our reality right now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hi. Multiple-time election observer here. You don't just send your supporters into polling places to "go and watch." If a leader of a foreign country did that, international organizations would be extraordinarily concerned.
Election observation is not something anyone can simply *go and do.* It requires training. It requires restraint. The fact that the President is encouraging his supporters to "go and watch" is inviting voter intimidation and potentially violence.
One of the things we look for when we are visiting polling stations in foreign countries is large crowds that are clearly there to agitate for one party or another. This is an indication that something is very wrong, that one group is trying to keep another away from the polls.
Reading @sobieraj's CREDIBLE THREAT; am just a few pages in and already so many striking passages.
"We don't really see people lashing out at people; we primarily see men lashing out at women, particularly woman from historically marginalized groups."
To be a woman in public life in the internet era is to have men constantly appraising your physical experience while you are expected to sit quietly, enduring it; objecting is seen as unprofessional & unladylike.
Here are the parts of my body random jerks have judged this week:
My face
My chin
My feet
My breasts
My hair
Once after a TV appearance a man wrote to me to tell me I had a “strange darkness in the esophageal area of my throat”
That of course is in addition to the folks who want to take away my voting rights, who call me “AWFL” (angry white female liberal).
Yes, I am very angry- but expressing that would be a faux pas. Meanwhile, targeted harassment continues, my reports to @TwitterSupport go nowhere
1. Dispensing with the most important thing first:
-Voting by mail is safe and secure.
-Several states, including Republican-led Colorado, voted by mail pre-pandemic. It does not lead to fraud.
-States have ballot-tracking measures in place; counterfeiting a ballot is hard.
2. China, Russia, and Iran are all attempting to influence our political discourse right now.
So are domestic disinformers (including by paying troll farms staffed with minors).
Disinformation is a detriment to democracy no matter where it's coming from.
Upsetting but not surprising story from @CraigSilverman@RMac18@PranavDixit details how Facebook prioritizes the US and Western Europe in its policy response. An internal memo from a FB data scientist lists Ukraine among the countries affected. buzzfeednews.com/article/craigs…
Here's a little about why we all suffer from Facebook's negligent content moderation practices, and why we in the West are privileged when we suggest "boycotting" Facebook: medium.com/@nina.jankowic…
And more on what I tracked when I reported from Ukraine (in short: negligence) during the country's 2019 presidential election, with support from @pulitzercenterpolitico.eu/article/facebo…