Thread: Some remarkable scenes from the king and queen's appearance with the (presumably carefully selected) public at the palace area this evening. The king was introduced to a man who recently made headlines for standing among youth protesters holding a royal portrait. /1
The king thanked him, touched him on the shoulder and said he was very brave. The king also gave a friendly greeting to a man who appears to be Buddha Issara, touching him several times and whispering in his ear. /2
Buddha Issara is a former monk who led a radical faction of the royalist-nationalist PDRC protest in 2014. He was then defrocked for a number of crimes, including firearms offences and misuse of royal insignia. He recently vowed to rally supporters to "defend the monarchy" /3
Thread: last year I wrote an article arguing that the era of red versus yellow isn't over in Thailand. This picture was taken about a week ago, on the 14th October. /1
The things that separated the red and yellow shirts a decade ago were different ideas about representative democracy, equality under the law, the supremacy of the constitution and the role of the monarchy and military in Thailand. /2
The younger generation grew up watching this struggle take place and were so sickened by the behaviour of the "yellow" side, that they turned completely against them, rejecting their royalist-nationalist, undemocratic vision of Thailand. /3
Thread: I'm extremely concerned about Francis Bunkueanun Paothong, an International Relations student in our faculty at Mahidol University International College (MUIC) /1 #Saveบุญเกื้อหนุน
Police have opened a case against him and another well-known activist, Ekachai Hongkangwan, using Section 110, which states that "whoever commits an act of violence against the liberty of the queen shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or of 16 to 20 years" /2
This case is highly unusual. Legal experts believe it is the first time this section has been used since the reign of Rama 8. /3 #Saveบุญเกื้อหนุน
Jasmine Chia, @ThaiEnquirer's best asset, has written the article I've been waiting for: the cultural meanings of face masks. It's an excellent piece, to which I just want to add some thoughts (thread).
She cites three reasons for the divergence of openness to mask wearing between Asian and Western societies (two constructs she correctly describes as "unstable").
1. Trajectories of economic development 2. Asian notions of collective responsibility
3. Western liberal notions of proper citizenship
All are interesting and plausible explanations.
To the last one, I'd also add a Western emphasis on individualism, rooted in the enlightenment, perhaps, but also given a large steroid injection by late capitalism and...