Randi had such a tremendous sense of awe and wonder—it would have thrilled him beyond measure if the phenomena he spent his life debunking had turned out to be real.
I once had the chance—at the end of a long and lovely conversation—to ask a good friend of Randi's, who'd been a paranormal researcher before becoming a debunker, how she thought he'd respond if she brought him actual proof it was true.
Her face lit up. It wasn't a question she'd ever been asked before. I could see her imagining the scene in her head—the reflexive skepticism, the inevitable lengthy testing—and then emerging, somehow, on the other side.
Randi's gone. He's not waiting for us somewhere. I'm nearly as certain of that as he was himself up until a day or two ago. But still. What a thing to imagine.
By the way, as someone who once spent a couple of years alongside @tiltmom researching James Randi's life, I am very very pleased to report that his Times obit is liberally festooned with tall tales and bunkum. nytimes.com/2020/10/21/obi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Johnston

Angus Johnston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @studentactivism

14 Oct
I am glad to see an Actual Lawyer confirming that the First Amendment has six clauses, not the five that Sasse and Barrett cited, since that's the way I've been teaching it for decades.
From a half-remembered law journal article I read sometime in the last century: Each of the six clauses in the First Amendment builds on the one that precedes it, so that if you remove any of the six, the ones that follow it collapse.
Freedom of belief, free exercise, freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, freedom of petition. Swipe anything from that list, and everything after it is hollowed out and rendered meaningless.
Read 7 tweets
14 Oct
I don't know much about much, but it's kind of looking like the Trump camp somehow got their hands on some raunchy sex-and-drugs photos and video of Biden's kid, then ginned up fake documentation and a bogus provenance to make it look like a corruption story.
The photos and video (one drug pic in today's paper, more apparently to come) are both to get people to look and to lend the other stuff a vague air of authenticity, but the whole thing doesn't actually seem to make any sense.
(I had the phrase "Biden's addict kid" in the first tweet in this thread, to indicate that there's no news in the photos, and to point out that they're trying to shame him for his addiction, but some folks thought the wording was too glib, so I rephrased.)
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
This polling really elegantly illustrates something I've been thinking a lot about the state of the race as it pertains to the electoral college. (Super quick thread to follow.)
The states and districts in blue on this map are those where Biden is leading by 7.5 points or more. The states in red are those where Trump is leading by 2 points or more (plus Iowa, which we'll get to in a second.) Now look at the brown states.
Every one of the brown states on the map is at least 11 electoral votes, and Biden is at 259 without any of them. That means that if Biden holds the blue states, a victory in ANY ONE of the brown states gives him the White House.
Read 11 tweets
10 Oct
I don't understand this impulse. It's not like there are a bunch of Good Militias out there whose name is being sullied by the association of "militia" with white supremacist domestic terrorism. Why not call them militias?
They call themselves militias. the public understands them as militias. Seems to me "militias are bad" is a much simpler project than "militias are good, actually, but something completely different than every militia you've ever heard of."
(And if that project puts a little more stink on the public perception of The Second Amendment As Currently Construed By The GOP ... oh well.)
Read 13 tweets
9 Oct
This is actually a great article about rich jerks who want to escape from society because they have no idea what society actually is or how being a part of it works. nytimes.com/2020/10/09/rea…
"I want to buy an island that's a zillion miles from anything but also has all the amenities I'm used to at the tips of my fingers. And no climate change."
"I'd like to escape from everything forever, but I'm not willing to quarantine in a luxury hotel for two weeks to make it happen."
Read 5 tweets
9 Oct
A thought experiment on "eradicating Trumpism" for wistful Republicans: Is there a scenario in which Trump is alive and not imprisoned in which he is not a speaker at the 2024 Republican National Convention?
I just don't see a mechanism by which Trump is so decisively repudiated that his supporters don't remain an essential component of the GOP base. When he (eventually) dies, that problem can be papered over. But not until.
To put it another way, a LOT of elected Republicans tried to tank the 2016 election after Access Hollywood. They were 100% ready to take the L, put Trump in the trash, and regroup to beat Hillary in 2020. But their base wouldn't let them.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!