Assault against YouTuber: Kerala High Court is hearing the anticipatory bail applications preferred by Malayalam Film Industry dubbing artist Bhagyalakshmi and two others, Diya Sana and Sreelakshmi Arackal in a case registered for assaulting YouTuber Vijay P Nair.
The YouTuber had made sexist and offensive remarks against the women. The women rushed to Nair’s office and poured black oil on his face for his vulgar remarks against one of the women and against ‘feminists’ generally. The assault was streamed live on Facebook.
Before leaving, they took his laptop and left.
Their earlier bail plea before a Thiruvanathapuram Sessions Court was rejected by a Court which stated that no one could take the law into their own hands.
Advocate KP Jayachandran appears for the women.
He argues that the women were invited by the YouTuber to his office, and he tried to physically harm them after which they assaulted him, he stated.
They had no intention to rob the Youtuber that attracted Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, they have surrendered the devices to the police: Jayachandran
The prosecution is making submissions.
Advocate Renjith B. Marar is challenging the bail application preferred by Diya Sana, who supposedly threw the ink and oil at Nair.
The fact that she went with oil and ink, and took away his laptop without authority shows her dishonest intention: Marar
Marar, as did the prosecution, argued that the three had barged into Nair's residence and weren't invited.
She threatened me, this is seen on the video: Marar
"She is camouflaging herself as a feminist": Marar on the second accused
How would you justify the charges under Section 452 IPC against them?: Justice Ashok Menon
there is no "preparation" to attract the offence
"We cannot encourage vigilantism, they should not have taken the law into their own hands": Menon J
Justice Menon announces that he will pronounce judgment in the manner on 30th
Another counsel for a third party applicant, other than Advocate Marar appears.
Why are you submitting, your application will also be dismissed along with Marar's: Ashok Menon J
You are learned persons in law, which is why I'm listening to your submissions: Menon J says in jest
Judgement in the matter will be pronounced on 30th.
*30th of October.
Till then, the accused have been afforded protection from arrest.
"She is camouflaging herself as a feminist", arguments in Youtuber assault case; Kerala High Court reserves order
The petitions challenging the winding up of debt schemes were transferred from the Delhi High Court, the Gujarat High Court, and the Madras High Court.
News Broadcasting Standards Authority directs Aaj Tak to air apology on October 27 at 8 PM, in its order on complaint regarding fake tweets telecast relating to actor Sushant Singh Rajput. Fine of one lakh imposed on the channel.
NBSA has also directed other news channels including ABP News, India TV and News 24 to air apologies in relation to sensational and insensitive reporting of Sushant Singh Rajput death.
Faizan Khan was arrested by Delhi Police in the case pertaining to the conspiracy that led to the riots in the capital’s North-East area in February 2020. #DelhiRiots
The specific allegation against Faizan was that he activated the SIM card while working as the authorized Airtel representative at a store called Golden Communication. #DelhiRiots
Mumbai Police registers FIR against the editorial team of Republic TV for allegedly defaming Mumbai Police, trying to cause"disaffection" among members of police force.
On complaint of Police officer Shashikant Pawan, NM Joshi Marg PS has registered case u/s 3(1) Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act 1922, Sec. 500, 34 IPC against Sagarika Mitra Dy News Editor, Shivani Gupta Anchor/Sr Associate Editor, Shawan Sen &
Niranjan Narayanswamy
The FIR is also against the Editorial staff and Newsroom Incharge for the concerned report getting aired and others.
FIR says accused by airing the concerned report have commited offences amounting to incitement to disaffection among members of the Police Force and defamed it
Gold Smuggling Case: : Kerala High Court extends interim protection against arrest to suspended Kerala CMO Bureaucrat M. Sivasankar, reserves orders in the case.
Sivasankar approached the Court apprehending arrest in the investigations launched against him by the Customs and ed
Appearing for Sivasankar, Senior Vijayabhanu submitted that the allegations as were made out were vague and were based on likelihoods.
The Customs and ED on the other hand stated that he was not made an accused yet, and granting him anticipatory bail at this stage would hamper the investigations, considering his influence and status.
Delhi Court to shortly begin hearing Delhi Police plea for extension of Umar Khalid's judicial custody in connection with a Delhi riots case under UAPA.