The petitions challenging the winding up of debt schemes were transferred from the Delhi High Court, the Gujarat High Court, and the Madras High Court.
The Court had began hearing the submissions of parties from August 12 and closed the hearing on September 24.
As the Court was bound to dispose of the matter within three month as per the Supreme Court direction, the hearings were taken up on Saturdays as well as other holidays.
In a letter released on September 28, FT had informed investors that the Karnataka High Court had finished hearing all the arguments and that, it was awaiting the judgement of the Court.
On October 5, the HC had posted pleas relating Franklin Templeton debt schemes to a later date as Franklin International had filed two additional affidavits.
In April, Franklin Templeton had announced its decision to wind up 6 of its debt schemes citing low liquidity. Nearly 3 lakh investors were affected by this sudden decision of FT.
The Bench has arrived.
Bench: 1. Regulations 39 to 40 are VALID. 2. For winding up, trustees have to get the obtain the consent of the investors. 3. Trustees of FT have violated mandatory provisions of SEBI.
Bench: No Interference is required in the decision of winding up of debt schemes by the FT Trustee. However, the Trustees should obtain consent of investors.
Breaking: No Interference can be made in the decision of Trustee to wind up the 6 schemes. However, consent from unit holders as per regulations to be obtained. Hence, we restrain FT Trustee not to proceed WITHOUT obtaining consent of unit holders.
Bench: We deem it appropriate to stay the operation of the judgment for a period of 6 weeks. None of the Respondents will take any steps on the basis of the notices issued by FT in April.
Bench: During the said 6 weeks, there will be no redemptions by investors. The Trustee and FT are directed not to make more borrowings, causing more liabilities.
After pronouncement of order, the Bench rises.
No interference in decision of Franklin Templeton trustees to wind up 6 debt schemes: Karnataka High Court; judgment stayed for 6 weeks
News Broadcasting Standards Authority directs Aaj Tak to air apology on October 27 at 8 PM, in its order on complaint regarding fake tweets telecast relating to actor Sushant Singh Rajput. Fine of one lakh imposed on the channel.
NBSA has also directed other news channels including ABP News, India TV and News 24 to air apologies in relation to sensational and insensitive reporting of Sushant Singh Rajput death.
Faizan Khan was arrested by Delhi Police in the case pertaining to the conspiracy that led to the riots in the capital’s North-East area in February 2020. #DelhiRiots
The specific allegation against Faizan was that he activated the SIM card while working as the authorized Airtel representative at a store called Golden Communication. #DelhiRiots
Mumbai Police registers FIR against the editorial team of Republic TV for allegedly defaming Mumbai Police, trying to cause"disaffection" among members of police force.
On complaint of Police officer Shashikant Pawan, NM Joshi Marg PS has registered case u/s 3(1) Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act 1922, Sec. 500, 34 IPC against Sagarika Mitra Dy News Editor, Shivani Gupta Anchor/Sr Associate Editor, Shawan Sen &
Niranjan Narayanswamy
The FIR is also against the Editorial staff and Newsroom Incharge for the concerned report getting aired and others.
FIR says accused by airing the concerned report have commited offences amounting to incitement to disaffection among members of the Police Force and defamed it
Assault against YouTuber: Kerala High Court is hearing the anticipatory bail applications preferred by Malayalam Film Industry dubbing artist Bhagyalakshmi and two others, Diya Sana and Sreelakshmi Arackal in a case registered for assaulting YouTuber Vijay P Nair.
The YouTuber had made sexist and offensive remarks against the women. The women rushed to Nair’s office and poured black oil on his face for his vulgar remarks against one of the women and against ‘feminists’ generally. The assault was streamed live on Facebook.
Before leaving, they took his laptop and left.
Their earlier bail plea before a Thiruvanathapuram Sessions Court was rejected by a Court which stated that no one could take the law into their own hands.
Gold Smuggling Case: : Kerala High Court extends interim protection against arrest to suspended Kerala CMO Bureaucrat M. Sivasankar, reserves orders in the case.
Sivasankar approached the Court apprehending arrest in the investigations launched against him by the Customs and ed
Appearing for Sivasankar, Senior Vijayabhanu submitted that the allegations as were made out were vague and were based on likelihoods.
The Customs and ED on the other hand stated that he was not made an accused yet, and granting him anticipatory bail at this stage would hamper the investigations, considering his influence and status.
Delhi Court to shortly begin hearing Delhi Police plea for extension of Umar Khalid's judicial custody in connection with a Delhi riots case under UAPA.