A few thoughts on Borat. The main target of the movie is clearly Trump supporters, but I feel bad that Kazakhstan gets caught in the crosshairs. Based on his stereotype, you can see Cohen wants to critique Russians, Germans, and Arabs for historical reasons. 1/n
He picks on Kazakhstan as some kind of amalgamation of all three, despite it being a pretty successful country over the last two decades. This is likely because of its lack of influence, and because most Americans know nothing about it, letting him create any image he wants. 2/n
In the beginning, he tells us Kazakhstan celebrates the Holocaust. This is a completely invented slander. I know it's a movie, and these are jokes, but it's a joke with no historical basis at all and just takes advantage of the ignorance of the viewer. 3/n
Another thing that the viewer doesn't know is that Kazakhstan suffered one of the worst mass killings of the twentieth century itself. Instead of at least targeting the nations responsible, he's picking on an innocent victim. 4/n
Particularly striking since his message is supposed to be one of liberal tolerance. While many of Cohen's grudges are ethnic and historical, most are modern. You'll see jokes about Karens, racism, QAnon, Covid denial, all the liberal tropes. 5/n
If he was more of a pure ethoncentrist and less of a modern liberal, he'd love Trump for his Israel policy and ignore the rest. Although Borat was funny at certain points, there's nothing particularly interesting or novel about his critique of Trumpism. 6/n
Great minds think alike. 7/n
https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1319976057693503490
Sacha Baron Cohen's bio is #StopHateForProfit. It seems to me that under such a regime Borat should be the first thing to go. The movie is not actually as un-funny as you would expect from his real life political views, completely lacking in empathy or self-awareness. 8/n 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
