Last week a senior DHS official attempted to chill potential whistleblowers when he warned employees in a directive that unauthorized disclosures could be in violation of agency policy and federal law. Gag orders like this violate whistleblowing and free speech rights. THREAD ⬇️
1/ Why is this illegal? Because the blanket ban on unauthorized disclosures failed to include statutorily mandated language informing employees that their whistleblower rights supersede any non-disclosure restrictions.
2/ This latest action mirrors past attempts by DHS to illegally attempt to prevent employees from speaking out in fear of violating agency policy or being reported by their colleagues. We challenged a similar directive with AFGE in November 2019. …ress-350926-1087337.cloudwaysapps.com/wp-content/upl…
3/ All of these gag orders violate the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act and appropriations laws. As we approach the election, our Democracy Protection Initiative is providing resources to protect potential whistleblowers in these agencies: Democracy.whistleblower.org
4/ Our Legal Director Tom Devine commented: “Whether through the constitution, Whistleblower Protection Act or appropriations laws, this blanket prior restraint is flat out illegal and incompatible with our democracy.”
5/5 In response, we’ve sent a letter to DHS leadership with @AFGENational Council 119 asking DHS to immediately reissue a corrective communication to department employees reminding them of their right to make protected disclosures. Learn more: whistleblower.org/press-release/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, our motion to file an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in support of E. Jean Carroll in her long-standing defamation suit against President Trump was granted.
Here’s what that means ⬇️
1/ Carroll sued Trump in a New York state court alleging that the president defamed her by accusing her of lying to sell books in the wake of her account that he had raped her. The White House asked AG Barr to have the case “removed” to federal court.
2/ Barr promptly filed a motion to have the United States substituted for Trump as the defendant. According to Barr, everything the president says on issues of public concern constitutes part of his official duties, even defaming the reputations of his accusers.
A paper released today captures the results of a modeling project that demonstrates that the rapid spread of #COVID19 in immigrant detention facilities will put pressure on local health care systems if the ICE detention population is not decreased. (1/6) whistleblower.org/wp-content/upl…
The paper uses publicly available data to estimate the number of #COVID19 cases within ICE detention facilities at varying levels of virus transmissibility and the capacity of local hospitals to care for additional ICE detainee patients over 30/ 60/ 90-day time horizons. (3/6)