As pressure mounts on universities to adopt the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism, below is a snapshot list of individuals and institutions who have warned against its use in any kind of formal code... And still journalists frame it as ‘universal’ and ‘consensual’:
Kenneth Stern – Director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate and the chief drafter of the original IHRA definition who said in 2019 it “was never intended to be a campus hate speech code”
Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC
Stephen Sedley – former appeal court judge
David Feldman – Director of Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism
Geoffrey Robertson QC
Hugh Tomlinson QC...
Anthony Lerman – former director of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research
Dozens of Jewish organisations from around the world who signed an open letter in 2018 condemning the IHRA definition
Dozens of BAME and other minority groups from across the UK
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Like any political leader, Corbyn had his flaws. But the greatest threat to the established order is that history will remember him as a fundamentally decent, honest and principled leader who stood, and almost won, on a moderate platform of economic justice and climate renewal...
So long as that essential truth remains even on the margins of public discourse, so does the possibility of social democracy in Britain. That is why it must be relentlessly twisted, maligned and buried...
and why any mainstream journalist or columnist will be rewarded for dishing out 'insider gossip' based on the accounts of sources with obvious agendas...
Interesting analysis but the problem, in my humble view, is not that the party machinery is under the control of the 'dominant faction'. The problem is that the dominant faction IS the Labour Party...
The Corbyn project was a historical aberration. At least for the last 40 years, the left has only been tolerated so long as it was contained within the margins of the backbenches...
In spite of overwhelmingly powerful and hostile opposition within, without and throughout, Corbyn came within inches of Number 10, forcing an unprecedented number of government u-turns & climb downs, including a Tory 2019 manifesto that matched Labour's spending pledges in 2017..
John Ware has accused 'Corbynites' including @schneiderhome of omitting evidence.
Ironically, the controversial @bbcpanorama he presented last year did exactly that...
This is how an email authored by Seumas Milne was presented to viewers in a key sequence of the programme:
“…we need to review…
…muddling up political disputes with racism”
And this is what Milne actually said in the email:
"if we’re more than very occasionally using disciplinary action against Jewish members for antisemitism, something’s going wrong, and we’re muddling up political disputes with racism. Quite apart from this specific case, I think going forward we need to review"...
9 times out of 10 when people in Britain talk about protecting press freedom what they really mean is protecting press power...
There are two great myths that sustain this narrative. First that digital disruption has resulted in platform monopolies (eg Google) and/or new entrants (eg the Canary) are eclipsing the influence of newspaper owners and editors. This couldn't be further from the truth...
Empirical evidence overwhelmingly shows that major algorithms like Google News tend to favour 'legacy' media - including national newspapers - over alternative or partisan online media like the Canary...
John Ware – presenter of last year’s controversial Panorama episode on antisemitism in the Labour Party – has published an in-depth article decrying allegations of sabotage against Corbyn’s leadership...
In a 3K word piece he manages to overlook virtually all of what seems to be the most compelling evidence of sabotage...
For instance, Ware acknowledges that "the leaked report does contain enough private messaging to prove that many in Labour’s senior management team were praying for a humiliating Corbyn defeat [...] But that’s very different from saying they actively sought to bring it about"...
When, two Times journalists started promoting their forthcoming book on Twitter by suggesting it would expose the reality of factionalism in Corbyn's Labour, my first thought was that they were trying to exploit Left Twitter to drum up pre-sales...
Then I began to wonder whether, just maybe, these journalists might actually do what journalists are supposed to do - what virtually none of their colleagues had done for 5 years - and actually interrogate discrepancies between the dominant story and the overwhelming evidence...
Sadly, today's extract in the Sunday Times weighs in favour of my initial scepticism. The journalists paint a picture of Labour's GE19 campaign as riddled with internal conflict, portraying Corbyn as at once a meddling control freak and a useless bystander in his own campaign...