(Thread) Election Integrity

This question came to me through the “Ask Teri” tab on my blog 👇

Short answer: Yes there is oversight. Elections are regulated by statute, and the statutes provide for oversight. Each state has its own processes.

Shorter answer: Get involved!
1/ In CA, for example, the precinct “inspector” (person in charge of the polling place) and the poll workers count the ballots according to detailed instructions. The number of ballots is then reconciled between those voted and those unused so that each ballot is accounted for.
2/ Observers are allowed to watch the counting and recording of votes.

The inspector keeps a copy of the total so he or she can verify the number against the number used in the final state tally.

And who are these inspectors? Regular people who apply. My husband is one.
3/ After working a few elections as a poll worker, he was promoted to inspector.

In Georgia, the poll manager for each polling place and two sworn witnesses tabulate the votes. Observers (usually sent by the parties) are allowed to be present and watch.
4/ People observing the votes can’t interfere, but if they see a problem they can relay the problem to a team of lawyers monitoring the voting in that particular state. (If you’re a lawyer consider joining these teams. Most are volunteers.)
5/ In GA, three copies of the tabulation are generated: One copy is affixed to the door for the information of the public, another provided to the superintendent, and a third is kept with the polling place records.

(I'm getting this info from the GA rules)
6/ In Minnesota, all election workers, including those who count the votes, are called “judges.” (I love that)

Also, in MN employers are required to give employees time off work to be an elections judge. sos.state.mn.us/media/3110/ele…

sos.state.mn.us/elections-voti…
7/ Don't worry! I'm not going to run through each state, even though me = 🤓

Much of my “to do” list is what you, as a citizen, can do to help with election integrity. See: terikanefield-blog.com/things-to-do/
8/ When 150 million people vote in an election largely monitored by volunteers (some with very little training) there can (and will) be problems and issues.

(Gotta keep those teams of lawyers busy, right?)
9/ Problems will be exacerbated by the fact that one political party is trying hard to create trouble specifically to undermine public confidence in the results.

(I won't name which party, but . . . gimme an "R" 📣)
10/ But don't confuse the frustrating problems that can (and will) arise when 150 million people vote with the ability to subvert and undermine a U.S. presidential election.

My credentials: I've worked as a volunteer lawyer monitoring voting in 3 states.
11/ I knew people would start tagging me with "worries" about how Russia or someone else can hack or flip millions of votes without being detected.

A goal of Active Measures is to undermine public confidence in democratic processes as a way to undermine democracy.
12/ I can only speak about machines in Georgia and Nevada, and YES they are safe with a paper trail.

Consider: Thomas Rid, an expert in Russian disinformation tactics, said that the extent of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election was “designed to be overestimated.”
13/ Why would Russia want to be overestimated? It’s another example of the Strongman Con.

They hack into state systems, not because they can flip votes, but so that people will THINK they can flip votes, thereby elevating Putin's stature and undermining confidence in democracy.
14/ The real weapon they have is disinformation.

People underestimate the power of disinformation and overestimate the ability to fix a presidential election by flipping votes.
15/ I was so startled to see @marcorubio tweet something that was 100% true, I did a doubletake and wondered if there as a catch.

No catch.

Rubio is correct.

16/ P.S.

Please don't tell me that I'm naive and I don't understand how ballot-marking machines work. I understand it quite well, actually. My opinion is that spreading fear about the machines is more dangerous than any possible problems with machines . . .
17/ A court has looked at the GA machines and made appropriate orders to secure the election.
This thread is a blog post. terikanefield-blog.com/election-integ…
There are bound to be problems election day, which is why there are teams of lawyers and procedures in place to deal with them.

The most helpful thing people can do is vote early if possible.
People who work elections are not only doing a huge service (many-- if not most-- issues on election day could be solved with good workers) they also see up close how the procedures (and checks) actually work.

Thanks, @CindyEcksol
After the election, I think I'll do a special blog post and ask people who worked the election to contribute.

I did a screenshot so I could fit all three tweets.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

24 Oct
Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a home in Warm Springs.

I've thought 2020 has much in common with the 1932 FDR election.

Now that Biden is going to Warm Springs, that just clinches it.

(1932 was the Great Depression Democratic landslide)

nps.gov/nr/travel/pres…
The GOP attitude toward the Great Depression was like the Trump-FOX attitude toward Covid: It's not the role of government to solve these problems, which should be left to private interests.

Of course, Biden is going because Georgia's turning blue.
We know what followed FDR's election.

When he came to office, the country was in the Great Depression. The level of income inequality made democracy almost impossible. There was no social security, no regulatory agencies, almost no middle class.

He changed all that.
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
I couldn't resist. I'm listening to the 60 Minutes segment Trump posted.

Goodness. Stahl asks Trump if he is ready for tough questions. He fusses about wanting her to be fair. He says, “You don’t ask Biden tough questions.”

My teenager: “He sounds like a three-year-old.”
He's in his own made-up world.

"We had the best economy. Things were coming together. . .there was going to be unity. Then we got hit with the plague. . . we closed it up and I saved millions of lives."

Unity? Before the virus was his impeachment trial.
It's obvious what Trump meant when he called Stahl "biased": She refuses to accept his version of reality.

When she refused to go along with his version of reality, he got angry and frustrated.

Also, he was the rude one.
Read 4 tweets
21 Oct
Here you have it. The greatest threat to democracy.

Democracy is based on rule of law, which requires a shared truth (a functioning public sphere).

Trump walked out of the 60 Minutes interview because he has only one way to win: He lies, and everyone repeats the lie.
Two key lies launched Trump into politics: Birtherism and "I am a successful businessman." It worked! He lied. People repeated the lies. Then enough people believed them.

He literally has no other way to "govern" or campaign.
This is nothing new. It's as old as written history.

In the middle ages, one of the lies was Jewish blood libel.

Want to go farther back? Let's talk about Darius I of Persia (522 BCE to 486 BCE)

He's sort of like the original Donald Trump. . .

Read 10 tweets
20 Oct
(Thread) Here's the Thing About Democracy

I started a new thing on my blog. I added an “Ask Teri” button. Back when I had 200 followers on Twitter, I answered every question. Now I can’t. (I can't even see everything) I’ll see if this works better.

Question #1 ⤵️
1/ A lot is being written about how to strengthen our battered institutions. I plan to devote full blog posts to particular reforms that can help.

But here’s the thing about democracy: At any given time, a majority of voters can decide it’s time to end democracy.
2/ In 2016, Trump ran as a “disruptor" and norm breaker. He promised to dismantle agencies, do away with regulations.

People who voted for him didn't care if he lied and cheated and broke rules. That's what they wanted.
Read 18 tweets
19 Oct
The GOP doesn't try to win elections by presenting plans that help to their constituents. They can't. Their plans hurt their constituents.

So they lie and stoke outrage.

Radcliffe knows he's lying, and so do most of the GOP base. They cheer the lies because the lies destroy.
Here's my Slate article from 2 years ago about why the Trump-GOP-Fox viewers believe (actually, pretend to believe) all the lies.

Hannah Arendt also explain why right wing leaders lie shamelessly. I'll put the Arendt quotation in the next tweet.

slate.com/news-and-polit…
When Hitler’s followers learned he lied, “instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.” Arendt
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
Trump is reportedly making a list of the Republicans who are now distancing themselves from him.
He's "contemplating retribution."

Hi, @realDonaldTrump: It looks like you can add @JohnCornyn to your "naughty" list.
See the link in the next tweet.
thedailybeast.com/trumps-taking-…
1/
Cornyn compares his relationship with Trump to a bad marriage. (He specifically compares himself to the woman🙄)

He also claims that he privately opposed Trump.

Yeah. Riiiight.

@JohnCornyn actively shielded Trump, including voting to acquit.
star-telegram.com/news/politics-…

2/
It reminds me of this passage from @stuartpstevens's book, It Was All A Lie⤵️

The passage rings true for me. It's one reason I never believed the "GOP elected officials are conspiring to cheat and throw the election to Trump even if he loses the election" theory.

3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!