A memorial games jam for David Graeber: itch.io/jam/intergalac… "The theme: 'live as if you were already free.' Make a game jam inspired by David Graeber's work, by anarchism, by revolutionary hope."
Here @BluejoWalton writes about Graeber's Debt and writing SFF. "One of the problems with writing science fiction and fantasy is creating truly different societies. We tend to change things but keep other things at societal defaults." tor.com/2012/04/16/the…
Debt: The First 5,000 Years libcom.org/files/__Debt__… One of the many great things about this book is that it showcases the amazing variety of historical economic arrangements, a variety left out of (say) most fantasy games
Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology: abahlali.org/files/Graeber.… A beautifully suggestive pamphlet partly about levelling mechanisms (how does an egalitarian society protect its egalitarianism?), and also about projecting or sublimating violence into a realm of fantasy ...
Utopia of Rules: libcom.org/files/David_Gr… I haven't actually read this one, but it's about bureaucracy and structural violence and other things and looks very interesting.
On Kings (Graeber and Marshall Sahlins): haubooks.org/wp-content/upl… "... there is at the same time a mutually constitutive relation between the king’s containment and his power: the very taboos that constrain him are also what render him a transcendent metabeing."
Here's an article focusing on the barter myth specifically (some overlap with material in Debt). nakedcapitalism.com/2011/09/david-… Gunwinggu's dzamalag:
The decolonising utopia reading / resource list is also just excellent to throw in there at the intersection of anarchism, speculative culture, activism, and play: utopia.ac/resources/deco…
On modes of production: "The division between slavery, feudalism & capitalism was clearly designed to describe class relations in ancient, medieval & modern Europe, respectively. It was never clear how to apply the approach to other parts of the world." libcom.org/files/graeber_…
In some historic moneys, every 80 counted is rounded up to 100. So one transaction valued at 100,000 shells 'really' only transfers 64,000 shells, whereas 100,000 transactions of one cowry each would transfer all 100,000. Any guesses how such a convention alters market structure?
All else being equal, perhaps it favors the elite who are rich enough to deal in more expensive goods or in bulk when it's advantageous? But also encourages distribution via many small transactions, such as are associated with subsistence and more ‘everyday’ consumption?
Bearing on price-stickiness? The nominal price of a good can remain stable for longer spells simply because its merchants are not tinkering with the spread between buying and selling price, but rather reaping the profit associated with trading at a single customary price point?
To be fair, I don't think the FT is one of the worst UK newspapers. (The worst is probably The Guardian, positioning itself as the genteel voice of the left and then falling in line at election time when parliamentary social democracy gets anywhere near wielding state power) ...
... & I think this sentence is more of an accidental auto-detourne or self-pwn than the ruling classes dropping their masks and speak frankly as they feast on honey-glazed roast workers. And the article has been 'corrected' (the 'thankfully' moved) ...