NI Protocol explicitly prevents the creation of a border on the island of Ireland. As a result, it creates one in the Irish Sea.
If you don't agree with that - do tell where is the border between the EU and UK in Ireland - two sovereign territories - there must be one
It's possible to have a border with asymmetric formalities (very rare but nonetheless) and the NI Protocol does just that.
It provides for a range of controls to ensure the border can be diluted as much as possible.
Or at least it was supposed to cause we still don't have proper guidance, BOM or info from the JC.
The UK Gov's denial of that fact and reluctance to admit it will need to monitor what moves from NI to GB is shortsighted and unsustainable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A border is not something you can decide to have or not depending on what suits your political goals- it's what separates and divides two independent, sovereign territories.
NI will have a dual-status which makes that border unique and perhaps you could even argue that the whole of NI will be the border (semantics, I know) but the reason I think this tweet from an official account is irresponsible is this:
/2
We have just over 2 months to go and we're still missing crucial info about this weird, non-existing, asymmetrical border. I'm not even talking about the operating model.
/3
I always thought of TSS in the context of Art 5 point 6 of the NI Protocol – as a way for UK Gov to reimburse, waive and compensate companies in NI for the extra admin costs.
It was to be an alternative to using a customs broker, provided for by the Gov and free for users
/2
We were initially told that the service will cover customs as well as safety and security declarations and will be available to NI traders for GB and ROW trade as well as GB traders who export to NI.
/3
Another IRISH SEA BORDER update. Heads up for all NI and Irish businesses - on mandatory transit and clearance in NI.
This one is a bit technical but bear with me.
(h/t @tconnellyRTE for helping me look into this a bit deeper)
/1
Having spoken to a number of organisations including BIFA and BCC, most of us assumed that under the NI Protocol once the goods arrive in NI that's it:
goods at risk pay EU tariffs and they are cleared and can move south to the ROI.
/2
In hindsight, it was probably wishful thinking but it did seem like that was the point of having the "at risk" category in the first place.
Well, that's not how it's going to work. This will be much more of a hard border.
/3
First thoughts on the new version of the Border Operating Model
Nothing has changed – it's all additions to the previous version.
We’re getting a lot more info on infrastructure – sites for transit, SPS checks etc.
/1
This is helpful as it will allow businesses and intermediaries to plan for their trade lanes. Especially for businesses planning to use transit or needing additional checks
/2
Nothing on NI - but we knew that in advance.
New info on so-called multi-functional inland infrastructure sites - their function (on 1 Jan as well as 1 July) and location.
/3