A border is not something you can decide to have or not depending on what suits your political goals- it's what separates and divides two independent, sovereign territories.

/1
NI will have a dual-status which makes that border unique and perhaps you could even argue that the whole of NI will be the border (semantics, I know) but the reason I think this tweet from an official account is irresponsible is this:

/2
We have just over 2 months to go and we're still missing crucial info about this weird, non-existing, asymmetrical border. I'm not even talking about the operating model.

/3
Still awaiting confirmation of how goods "at risk" will be determined (and hence which goods will not be subject to EU tariffs) and perhaps more importantly about the nature of clearance in NI.

/4
Something I wrote about a few weeks ago - will clearance in NI be possible for ROI firms - won't bore you with details here but it has important implications for biz.

/5


ROI customs have a view, HMRC confirmed they are aware and are looking into it - outcome unclear.

With so much confusions and unanswered questions it actually is concerning that the conversation is about semantics and whether or not we call this a border.

/6
We are so late and so close to the deadline I'm seriously surprised that the UK Gov has time to play this game rather than start providing some answers about how all this is going to work.

/7
I know it's just another PR distraction but at the end of the day, there are businesses and ppl out there whose financial wellbeing depends on whether we're ready on time or not.

Ppl that will actually be affected by this. Just ask @MichaelAodhan

/8
And in that context this tweet, to me, sounds in poor taste.

Get the work done and then worry about semantics and PR. Or convincing ppl that there is no border.

/9
Or better yet - once you've proven to the ppl of NI and UK businesses trading with NI that they can continue to trade, that they won't lose their livelihood/jobs/businesses.

Seriously, now is not the time.

/ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

24 Oct
NI Protocol explicitly prevents the creation of a border on the island of Ireland. As a result, it creates one in the Irish Sea.
If you don't agree with that - do tell where is the border between the EU and UK in Ireland - two sovereign territories - there must be one
It's possible to have a border with asymmetric formalities (very rare but nonetheless) and the NI Protocol does just that.
It provides for a range of controls to ensure the border can be diluted as much as possible.
Or at least it was supposed to cause we still don't have proper guidance, BOM or info from the JC.
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
Short 🧵on the Trader Support Service – the Gov sponsored customs support for NI. What it is and what it will do.

The system goes live on 21 Dec (yes… 4 days before the deadline).

/1


gov.uk/guidance/trade…
I always thought of TSS in the context of Art 5 point 6 of the NI Protocol – as a way for UK Gov to reimburse, waive and compensate companies in NI for the extra admin costs.

It was to be an alternative to using a customs broker, provided for by the Gov and free for users

/2
We were initially told that the service will cover customs as well as safety and security declarations and will be available to NI traders for GB and ROW trade as well as GB traders who export to NI.

/3
Read 14 tweets
13 Oct
Another IRISH SEA BORDER update. Heads up for all NI and Irish businesses - on mandatory transit and clearance in NI.

This one is a bit technical but bear with me.

(h/t @tconnellyRTE for helping me look into this a bit deeper)

/1
Having spoken to a number of organisations including BIFA and BCC, most of us assumed that under the NI Protocol once the goods arrive in NI that's it:

goods at risk pay EU tariffs and they are cleared and can move south to the ROI.

/2
In hindsight, it was probably wishful thinking but it did seem like that was the point of having the "at risk" category in the first place.

Well, that's not how it's going to work. This will be much more of a hard border.

/3
Read 11 tweets
12 Oct
On the NI Trader Support Service - why it's one of the biggest areas of risk in terms of Brexit readiness and why it has to work

/1


gov.uk/guidance/trade…
The Irish Sea border needs to be fully operational on 1 Jan. No simplifications, no phase-in period. Everything needs to work.

The contract for TSS has only been awarded a few weeks ago based on a last-minute proposal and design (the entire tender process was rushed).

/2
TSS will have several functions. One of them will be to provide customs advice to traders.

For that it needs consultants – that’s why the Institute of Export is hiring ppl.

You might also remember that we have a massive national shortage of ppl with customs knowledge.

/3
Read 13 tweets
8 Oct
First thoughts on the new version of the Border Operating Model

Nothing has changed – it's all additions to the previous version.

We’re getting a lot more info on infrastructure – sites for transit, SPS checks etc.

/1
This is helpful as it will allow businesses and intermediaries to plan for their trade lanes. Especially for businesses planning to use transit or needing additional checks

/2
Nothing on NI - but we knew that in advance.

New info on so-called multi-functional inland infrastructure sites - their function (on 1 Jan as well as 1 July) and location.

/3
Read 7 tweets
7 Oct
Follow this 🧵by @nickgutteridge if you don't feel like watching it live

Lord Thomas asking excellent questions on the Internal Market Bill
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!