In general I’m very sympathetic to jurisdictions opting for some or all remote school instruction. However I also recognize that there is increasing though still not dispositive evidence that suggests that schools, particularly k-6 are not playing a major roles in disease ...
2/ spread. But it seems odd to me that we’re not seeing more discussion of the fact that the latest surge coincides close to exactly with the resumption of school after the summer. Now, I know that the presumed - and I assume real - culprit is seasonality. More time indoors ...
3/ because of cold weather and drier air which seems to be more conducive to the spread of respiratory viruses in general. But the coinciding chronology seems to merit at least come consideration. This is especially the case since in most school districts surveillance ...
4/ testing is very, very limited. Since kids are frequently asymptomatic, it’s not entirely clear how we’d know if schools were serving as covid incubators for some measure of spread into the broader community.
5/ I stress again, seasonality seems like the logical and primary culprit. And I assume it is. It just seems the general chronology shld make us cautious about pronouncements re schools.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Telecoms are so crooked. My wife on third day of calls with @ATT after we found out they’d been charging for a phantom iPad for years. One absurd excuse, lie after another. The latest is they want to know the credit number she used 20 years ago when she first signed up for att.
2/ So they’re basic saying she needs to prove who she is now, I guess on the theory that someone is impersonating my wife to get @ATT to refund a fraudulent charge? That makes sense. And they can only know it’s her if she can remember the credit number she used in 2000?
3/ The really bonkers thing is that we caught them doing this before. It was like the cell phone account zombie apocalypse. Each time we’d stop service or get a new device they’d later bring the old device account back to life and start charging us again. I spent ....
This is a very good column. And it includes details of what sounds like yet more White House lawbreaking. But I disagree with Ben that this is a reassertion of an elite media gate keeping role. There’s hardly a blackout of the purported hunter ... nytimes.com/2020/10/25/bus…
2/ biden hard drives. There are lots of stories about it in msm publications. Not to mention the fact that I think it’s dubious to say that fox, wsj, nypost et al aren’t part of the elite press. The key is really who decides what the story is. For decades the elite ...
3/ political press has been wired for the GOP. This has been true for a number of reason. But the upshot is a pattern that right media defines what the question and then more elite corporate media engages that question, even if their conclusions are sometimes different.
The big story here, of course, is that the President and his top advisors appeared to relying on a strategy in which a brazen act of corrupt and possibly criminal conduct by top appointees saved his campaign. But there's another point to consider.
2/ Trump has been telegraphing and demanding these kinds of corrupt actions for so long and for such openly political reasons it's worth asking whether it would actually have a major effect. If Bill Barr came out tomorrow and announced an investigation into Joe Biden ...
3/ running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor would the reaction be "wow, guess we really didn't know the real joe biden!" or "holy shit, Barr is degrading DOJ to save Trump". Obviously that would break down a lot along party lines. But spending two or three years demanding..
Seeing lots of folks say, well, no they're just shred all the documents. Not precisely. I do expect document destruction. But the details matter here. Most of the President's biggest crimes are not clearly statutory crimes. Some are, some aren't. It's debatable.
2/ Destruction of federal records is a straight up federal crime with serious penalties. No ambiguity. Just as important, the federal government is very large. The federal govt is a document creation machine. It's quite difficult to shred everything. And the shredding ...
3/ itself leaves a record. Critical the principals can't do that much themselves. They need lower level people and even civil servants to commit lots of felonies on their behalf as they lose power. That's a very tall order.
As the bottom starts to fall out and rat's flee, remember that this is essential. The executive branch needs an audit. We cannot move forward without first knowing the details of the abuses and crimes. I explain here. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/folks-t…
2/ The critical thing - and Trump clearly knows this and it terrifies him - is that all of President Trump's immunity disappears the moment he exits the Presidency. Just as important President's hold over his secrets, the records of his presidency all of that will migrate to ...
3/ the hands of the new President, who now looks likely to be Joe Biden. Every detail, every transcript, every record and the power over them is in the hands of the new President. Presidents often defer to the wishes of former President's. But it's purely a courtesy.
Let me expand a bit on this. What is called "originalism" in the legal academy is something that doesn't really survive first contact with any serious historical examination of the period. It's a sort of academic bubble boy which can only exist in the controlled environment ...
2/ of the legal academy. But the Civil War amendments - if we are talking about what they were conceived as at the time and the intentions behind them - do amount to a refounding of the constitution. They are not mere revisions like one might see most of the other amendments.
3/ Justice Marshall argued that the 1787 document was a morally deficient which has no moral or historical claim on us today. It is only with the Civil War amendments that we have an edifice that has any claim on us. Whether or not you believe that there's no question ...