There's a lot that's unimpressive about this new Bellingcat article attacking the OPCW whistleblowers, including their inability to quote me properly (which is the least of it -- more on that soon).
Before I comment further, I just sent @EliotHiggins, @N_Waters89 and @Bellingcat some questions about their story, and look forward to their response.
I wrote @EliotHiggins @N_Waters89 @Bellingcat an email outlining a few of the article's issues & asking some questions. They haven't responded, but have already made a correction based on an issue I raised. This correction is important, but doesn't begin to scratch the surface.
The error shows a fundamental misunderstanding on Bellingcat's part of what OPCW whistleblower "Alex" alleged.

Alex never "alleged" anything about the OPCW's motives for covering up the investigation. He simply alleged, and raised alarm, that the investigation was covered up.
Even their correction is a mischaracterization: "Alex" didn't insinuate anything. But although significant, Bellingcat makes far more serious errors. I'd like them to respond to my email -- rather than quietly issue corrections based on it -- before I add more.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Maté

Aaron Maté Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aaronjmate

23 Oct
Russiagate is a giant act of projection: intel officials & media stenographers, aka troll farms, have bombarded the public w/ disinformation & fear-mongering that sows doubts about US elections, all while accusing Russia of doing the same. Here's latest: nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/…
Usually caveats are buried, but here it's 2nd graf: US intel officials "have pieced together details of what they *believe* are Russia’s plans." And guess what: "Officials did not make clear what Russia planned to do." Of course not! They only "Believe" -- they don't *know*.
More caveats: purported Russian hackers breached a network that -- guess what -- had "nothing to do with the casting and counting" of votes.

BTW how do we know they're Russian hackers? We don't! They're only "*believed* to be operating at the behest of Russia's" FSB. Believe!
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct
Just did a search of @TheIntercept: this self-described "fearless, adversarial journalism" outlet, whose "founding principles" include "that whistleblowing is vital to holding powerful institutions accountable" has yet to acknowledge the OPCW Syria whistleblowers' existence.
Even NYT has acknowledged the OPCW scandal, albeit in a laughable & disingenuous way. NYT buried it in a fawning profile of Western troll farm Bellingcat, & shrunk the trove of OPCW leaks -- including the original, censored report -- into a mere "email from an investigator." 😂
Douma story is not one that @TheIntercept has ignored. Since alleged Douma attack of April 2018, TI ran at least 10 stories about or mentioning it -- most favorable to Trump admin narrative. Zero stories on the whistleblowers since their suppressed findings emerged in May 2019.
Read 5 tweets
21 Oct
Oh no. This is devastating for Chomsky. A notorious troll and stalker is upset at him for believing that the OPCW’s own inspectors should be heard. How will Chomsky weather this storm? thegrayzone.com/2020/10/20/cho…
Hey @im_PULSE, what url did you link to in order to substantiate your claim that Chomsky “joined a notorious conspiracy theorist”? Surely you, in trying to scold a revered figure such as Chomsky, must have solid evidence to support such a serious charge. Let’s see the link. 🍿
You wouldn’t believe how often I hear this around these parts:
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
New @PushbackShow: Noam Chomsky warns that the Trump admin poses a unique threat to humanity, but its most reckless policies -- from killing nuclear weapons accords with Russia to imposing new sanctions on Iran -- are receiving far too little attention.
Chomsky on OPCW scandal: "US & its allies want evidence provided by some of the top inspectors to be banned... they want to ensure it's not discussed, meaning they have no confidence in their own conclusions, meaning the US bombing of Syria was undertaken on false presences."
"Whether their report is correct or not, I have no judgment. But what we do know is the US & its allies don't want it discussed. They don't want evidence discovered by the some of their top inspectors to be looked at. The OPCW is capitulating to this, which is pretty shocking."
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
Trump admin rejects Russian proposal to extend New START, a vital nuclear accord, for just 1 year to avoid killing it entirely — & threatens “a costly arms race” unless Russia caves.

To all Russiagaters who demanded that Trump “stand up to Putin”, behold the fruit of your labor:
WhAt dOeS PuTiN HaVe oN TrUmP?
Poll question: do you think @maddow @chrislhayes @lawrence or any other prime time MSNBC or CNN show will even acknowledge that Trump is on the verge of killing New START, the Obama accord that limits the nuclear arsenals of US and Russia, and threatening a new arms race?
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
.@TheGrayzoneNews exclusive: ex-OPCW chief José Bustani defends the whistleblowers who challenged a cover-up of their Syria probe.

Bustani also reacts to US-allies blocking his UN testimony -- & reveals he was spied on before US ousted him over Iraq war.
The OPCW inspectors who challenged a cover-up of their investigation in Douma, Syria are so experienced that they worked under the OPCW's first Director General, José Bustani.

Here, Bustani explains why he has come forward to defend them. Full interview: thegrayzone.com/2020/10/18/ex-…
Former OPCW chief José Bustani on media silence over the OPCW Syria cover-up scandal, & how media coverage could make a difference in protecting the OPCW from political exploitation by US & other Western states.

cc @TheIntercept & @democracynow , who have ignored this story.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!