Chances are you've already seen this tweet. It's gone viral many times. Back in October, months before we knew about COVID, Biden pointed out we're not prepared for a pandemic. He was absolutely right. But I also wondered to myself: what did Trump tweet that day? (thread)
Trump tweeted or RT'd 47 times that day. Here was his first tweet of the day: mocking Reps @TimRyan and @EricSwalwell for dropping out of the presidential race. At 8:12am.
At 8:32am, Trump posted a thread defending his action to abandon our long-time Kurdish allies to Turkish violence. Turkey is accused of using chemical weapons against Kurdish citizens, murdering many, among other war crimes. An estimated 300,000 Kurds have been displaced.
Most of the afternoon was spent tweeting + RTing about the impeachment inquiry into Trump's efforts to withhold foreign aid from Ukraine in exchange for damaging info on Biden. Remember the impeachment trial? That was in January. Here he credits @LindseyGrahamSC for helping him.
At 6:39pm, he publicly whined to Apple CEO Tim Book about the swipe function on the iPhone.
At 7:30pm, he went back to the impeachment inquiry, tweeting about the whistleblower in the Ukraine scandal.
Three minutes later, he publicly calls for his lawyers to sue Rep. @AdamSchiff.
There's mostly a bunch of RTing over the next several hours, and then at 11:39pm, Trump closed out the day with this video about opioid crisis. Opioid deaths have increased 13% from last year, and yet it's still somehow not the biggest health care crisis under Trump.
I was curious how much Trump had even talked about pandemics on Twitter--his main comms avenue--before this year. According to the database at thetrumparchive.com, just one time in 2014 and not since then before COVID.
So, why was Biden coincidentally talking about a pandemic months before COVID hit? Because he was listening. The previous day, the Global Health Security Index released a report stating that the U.S. was not prepared for a pandemic. washingtonpost.com/health/2019/10…
The index ranked the United States 19th among countries evaluated in pandemic preparedness. The main factors driving down its rank? Among other things: low public confidence in the government's response capabilities. No kidding.
Biden read this and knew other things, like how Trump had disbanded the NSC Global Health Unit, which had included the federal government's pandemic response team. vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/t…
Anyway, that's what these two candidates were thinking on Oct. 25th when scientists were ringing alarm bells about our pandemic response capabilities. I leave you with this tweet from that day at 5:10pm.
I think he's right. We do get it. Make a plan: iwillvote.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, so, I'm biased, but I can't remember the last time I had so much fun watching a show than I did binging @netflix's "The Queens' Gambit". It is criminally short--just seven episodes--and I may threaten to cancel my subscription if they don't order a second season. (thread)
Where do I even start with this show's brilliance? There's so much to discuss. First, let's get this out of the way: it's based on a 1983 novel of the same name by Walter Tevis, which was published to damn good reviews. I have not yet read it, and I plan to after the election.
The plot: a young girl loses her brilliant and troubled mother in a horrific car crash and learns how to play chess from a janitor in an orphanage. The orphans are being drugged. She develops a drug addiction. She gets adopted by a very troubled woman.
The Constitution does not specify the number of seats on the Supreme Court. This power was left to Congress, which set the Supreme Court's size at one chief justice and five associates in the Judiciary Act of 1789. It was then legally changed seven times. (thread)
It underwent five full legal implementations:
1789-1807: six seats
1807-1837: seven seats
1837-1866: ten seats
1866-1867: nine seats
1867-1869: eight seats
1869-present: nine seats
And twice, legislation changed its size but was never implemented for various reasons, notably the Judiciary Act of 1801 (or Midnight Judges Act), which would have reduced its size to five upon the next vacancy but was repealed by the Judiciary Act of 1802.
This is an excessively ridiculous thing to say. The clip is from the early-2000s when the GOP was pushing an amendment to ban same-sex marriage, when upwards of 60% of voters opposed same-sex marriage. Biden + Dems smartly used DOMA as a rationale to deflect + block it. (1/3)
If the amendment had passed the House and Senate and been signed by Bush, it would have stood a decent chance of passing the required number of state legislatures to be ratified over the next several years, esp. given the unpopularity of same-sex marriage at the time.
So, Dems did the shit work of blocking the amendment by saying DOMA is enough until the electorate could catch up. Then, in 2012, in the middle of a tough reelection campaign, with the country split on the issue, Biden got out front + became the first national leader to endorse.
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|
| OKAY WHAT I MEAN TO SAY IS THAT |
| WHILE I AM NOT THE PHYSICAL CITY |
| IT IS WITHIN MY REALM AS QUEEN |
| ________________________________________|
(\__/) ||
(•ㅅ•) ||
/ づ
"Borat 2" might be the most clever feminist movie in recent memory. I love that people who are watching it are clearly enjoying it and then going: "Wait... is this... is this feminist?"
I do think a lot of "satire" isn't nearly as insightful or interrogating as it pretends to be. "Borat 2" somehow takes a lot of shock humor and turns it on its head in a way that makes you ask questions about everyone in the film; it provokes interrogation, even while laughing.
Like... I honestly wish literally anyone would make a film with this kind of verve and accessibility on trans issues -- that viewers would enjoy themselves and ask questions about gender identity that the satire guides them in. I don't know that would look, but I wish it existed.
The non-story was confirmed to be a non-story and a smear attack, but instead of readjusting and just saying that, they're pretending it's all still up in the air and they're just doing a public service. Give me a break.
And then to have the audacity to compare Biden finally pushing back to Trump's attacks on the press? Please, grow up.