Share this page!

Will Stancil Profile picture
Twitter logo
27 Oct, 5 tweets, 2 min read
It's true: the election is in seven days. What, exactly, has Pelosi done to slow Trump down?
Did she help ferret out his misdeeds? Did she outmaneuver him at the negotiating table, achieving Dem priorities? Did she hold his cronies accountable or uncover corruption at the agencies? Did she ever use any of the "arrows in her quiver" that she wasn't going to talk about?
Or was she, at best, a mildly irksome presence for Trump in the House, someone who insulted him time to time while holding her own caucus at bay and suppressing any movement within it to impose consequences or accountability on the administration?
Pelosi's dismal do-nothing speakership, which, aside from the narrow impeachment she was forced to bring, consisted entirely of her offering an endless rotation of excuses for why nothing could or should be done about Trump, is one of the greatest political failures of my life
To all the party leadership shills saying "What else could Democrats have possibly done???" here's a partial list:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Will Stancil

Will Stancil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whstancil

Will Stancil Profile picture
28 Oct
Here's what political media needs to understand about the catastrophe of 2016: it's not bad luck that led it to absorb and propagate right-wing talking points.

It was real incentives and social pressures - all of which CONTINUE TO EXIST TODAY. crooked.com/articles/2020-…
As long as political media remains a tightly-knit circle of elite insiders whose professional advancement depends chiefly on the approval of each other, there will be strong pressure to revert back to the failed practices of the past.
It doesn't help, either, that political media circles are connected to a large number of GOP partisans who remain part of the social scene, regardless of how unreliable they have proven. And it REALLY doesn't help that white men, and their fixations and biases, predominate.
Read 4 tweets
Will Stancil Profile picture
27 Oct
No, evaluating your party’s leaders as doing a poor job, and being willing to say so, does not actually indicate mental health conditions.

However, it connects to something else I’ve thought about a lot: how mentally draining it is to not trust leaders.
I’ve wondered if this is the root of the low-level panic a lot of Democrats feel, the constant attention suck that is Trump and politics, the doomscrolling: it feels like nobody is in charge and if we don’t pay close attention to every problem, every problem will get worse.
I’ve said this before but it’s simply exhausting - truly, physically exhausting - to know that not only will all manner of horrors occur between now and next week, every single week, but that even the people in government purportedly on our side will likely do nothing about them.
Read 8 tweets
Will Stancil Profile picture
26 Oct
best way to barbecue chicken
this man is not from my city
barbecue: a helpful guide
Read 7 tweets
Will Stancil Profile picture
26 Oct
The irony is that the kind of government Jamelle is describing - one in which the branches act to protect their own governing prerogatives - is much more reflective of the ideas of the US constitutions than the mechanistic process envisioned by his critics
A lot of people have this 5th-grade view of "checks and balances" where it means rules built into the system - veto, judicial review, confirmations. But it's broader than that: it's the idea that a hypertrophied branch will be cut back down to size when it endangers the other two
"Checks and balances" is a principle to be upheld and expressed in government, not an invitation to comb over the rules until - oops! - you find the trump-card rule that can't be checked or balanced, and use it to secure permanent control in defiance of electoral majorities
Read 4 tweets
Will Stancil Profile picture
23 Oct
protip: talking like this ("the takes were right directionally, but wrong magnitude-wise") is the secret handshake that makes you a member in good standing of the white male pundit social club
no normal person talks like this and the ideas being communicated are just broad observations undeserving of a veneer of mathematical precision. it's just a register - one designed to convey the speaker's own empiricism, objective rationality, and authoritative knowledge
code-switching to protect privilege
Read 5 tweets
Will Stancil Profile picture
22 Oct
who watches the watchmen

(me, I’m finally watching watchmen)
okay I will say, first five minutes, the masked cop is clearly supposed to be weird and intimidating and askew, but, uh
so far this show is trying very hard to be of the moment and some of it has worked and then sometimes it’s like “hey trigger warnings amirite”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @whstancil