Rather than addressing substantive issues raised by many regarding their investigation of the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma, Syria, the @opcw has responded by leaking a letter from its DG, Fernando Arias, & revealing the identify of one of its scientists. @RealDeeptiC
1) Remarkably the @opcw has chosen to leak this information to @bellingcat, a well-known state sponsored propaganda outlet. Interestingly @bellingcat was in communication with individuals manipulating the alleged crime scene at location 2 in Douma:
4) The letter does nothing of the sort and, in fact, appears to largely reiterate material published in the original interim report (the report that was secretly altered and redacted by OPCW management) regarding chemistry results. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
6) Nor does the letter address key toxicology, ballistics and witness testimony anomalies detailed by the @couragefound panel. Specifically, regarding toxicology, the OPCW final report suppressed evidence from expert NATO toxicologists.
7) The NATO toxicologists confirmed that these victims piled up at Location 2 were not poisoned by chlorine gas at that location.
8) regarding ballistics, substantial questions remain regarding how this cylinder was able to cause the observed damage at Location 2
9) Whilst the final OPCW report has failed to explain how the cylinder at Location 4 performed a remarkable, physically impossible, sideways bounce across a bedroom
10 The OPCW's purportedly scientific explanation of the cylinder's trajectory is the following glib statement:
11) The Final Douma report also suppressed the testimony of multiple eye witnesses whose accounts did not support the allegation that an attack had occurred. These inconsistencies were carefully documented in the original interim report wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
13) The conduct of the @opcw and its staff falls well short of what can reasonably be expected of an international organisation. It continues to attempt to smear and intimidate its staff (the attached is from a senior OPCW official) @RealDeeptiC
14) whilst ignoring the many eminent voices calling for truth and accountability:-
15) These voices include Jose Bustani, the First Director General of the OPCW, who recently addressed the UN Security Council regarding the flawed Douma investigation:-
16) All those who are involved, knowingly or unknowingly, with the suppression of transparent scientific analysis and the truth about Douma, should be aware that it is highly likely these civilian victims were the consequence of a horrific war crime: syriapropagandamedia.org/wp-content/upl…
One year ago today, the Courage Foundation Panel received testimony from an OPCW official detailing fraud and deception during the organisation's investigation of the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma, Syria: couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-p…
1) The panel learned many important facts about how information had been suppressed in order to reach 'a preordained conclusion'. The panel included many eminent figures, including the OPCW first Director General Jose Bustani, and has been supported by many more:
2)Within the last two week, although blocked by the US, US and France, Bustani issued a statement to the UN Security Council based upon what he had learned: couragefound.org/2020/10/ex-opc…
@malachybrowne@MaxBlumenthal Dear Mr Browne, would you like to comment on this communication from a senior OPCW official:-
@malachybrowne@MaxBlumenthal 1) Would you also like to comment on why you think this toxicology assessment, from NATO experts, was suppressed in the Final Douma Report?
@malachybrowne@MaxBlumenthal 2) The attached tweet confirms that the cylinder at Location 2 was manipulated and that those doing this were in communication with Bellingcat:-
@thomasphipps@RussiaUN@OPCW Thomas, some specific questions. Does the following statement from a senior OPCW official give you cause for concern?
@thomasphipps@RussiaUN@OPCW 2) This documents details the assessment made by NATO toxicologist confirming the deceased at Douma were not poisoned by chlorine gas. Can you ask the @opcw why this consultation was censored come the Final Douma report?
@thomasphipps@RussiaUN@OPCW 3) This BBC producer has repeatedly confirmed the hospital scenes in Douma were staged. Has the UK government requested that the BBC pass this information to the @opcw? If not, why not?
2) Because of the reported timings (see OPCW reports), if the hospital scenes were staged, so too were the scenes at location 2 where these deceased were found.
@UKPolDirRichard@nsoames The problem is that the OPCW Syria FFMs are procedurally and scientifically flawed, as indicated by this senior OPCW official.
1) For example, the Final OPCW FFM report on Douma obfuscated the clear evidence provided by 4 NATO toxicologists that the deceased at Douma could not have been killed by chlorine gas at Location 2.
2) @RobertF40396660, then Chief of Cabinet at the OPCW, allowed a US delegation to present their analysis to the OPCW FFM team: this represents undue pressure on the FFM team and is a breach of the Chemical Weapons Convention. @steelejourno article here:- counterpunch.org/2019/11/15/the…
@RichardHRBenyon Rather than hurling abuse and smears, would you like to reflect upon this message from a senior OPCW official and what that might mean for your confidence in the organisation:-
1) You might also reflect upon the conclusions of many notable individuals, including the first Director General of the OPCW, that something has gone seriously wrong at the OPCW:- couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-p…
2) You might also be concerned that 4 NATO toxicologists advised that the victims at Douma did not die from chlorine poisoning