The firewall that protected the Voice of America from political interference is gone, swept away by the new agency chief who has made clear he'll use the agency to push the Trump administration's views and objectives.

Via @davidfolkenflik

npr.org/2020/10/27/928…
Here's the view from @abennett, former VOA director:

This action "removes the one thing that makes Voice of America distinct from broadcasters of repressive regimes."
And the excuses given by the new CEO of the agency, Michael Pack, are just not grounded in experience.

Has the VOA been regularly publishing stories that "endanger US soldiers"? Of course not

usagm.gov/2020/10/26/bac…
Pack is an acolyte of Steve Bannon.

Trump nominated Pack in 2018, but the nomination stalled for years. He was finally confirmed by Senate Republicans after Trump complained that Voice of America had become the “Voice of the Soviet Union.”

nytimes.com/2020/06/04/us/…
Pack hasn't gotten around to removing this page from the VOA's site. It explains the purpose of the firewall. ...

insidevoa.com/a/4533487.html
That VOA page links to a 2018 Q&A about the firewall, in which Steven Springer, then editor for standards and practices at VOA, cogently explains how to handle a dicey situation with a congressman's office.

(Also: On his first day in his new job, Pack fired Springer.)
Here's the entire, remarkable Q&A (posted here before Pack removes it)

docs.google.com/document/d/1Ft…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bill Grueskin

Bill Grueskin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BGrueskin

26 Oct
Did a white person write this editorial?

“Donald Trump is a bully and a bigot.... He panders to racists. He tweets conspiracy theories. He’s cavalier about COVID-19 and has led poorly through the pandemic...

“We recommend voting for him anyway” spokesman.com/stories/2020/o…
It’s from the Spokane newspaper. H/t @Jon_Allsop
The gist of the piece is that racism and bigotry are acceptable tradeoffs for lower taxes and deficits.
Read 4 tweets
25 Oct
Been watching baseball for a long time and never saw a play like that one
Read 4 tweets
23 Oct
The news (I.e., the sane) side of the Wall Street Journal weighs in on the Hunter Biden affair and has very different findings from the edit page.

wsj.com/articles/hunte… ImageImageImage
In July, 280 WSJ journalists signed a letter to the publisher that included this:

"Opinion’s lack of fact-checking and transparency, and its apparent disregard for evidence, undermine our readers’ trust and our ability to gain credibility with sources”

wsj.com/articles/wsj-j…
The edit page gave the game away tonight when they had Kim Strassel handle such a complex and sensitive story - on deadline, no less.
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
Will this be as big a dud as your unmasking crusade?
Strassel relentlessly hyped the unmasking conspiracy theory for months, then went crickets when the US Attorney assigned to the case determined there was nothing to prosecute

washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Wow, I don't know how Joe Biden is going to survive this Kim Strassel paragraph that ... appears to exonerate Joe Biden
Read 4 tweets
21 Oct
Democrats *fret*
Democrats *fear*
Democrats *worry*

The press uses those terms much more often when writing about Democrats than Republicans -- even when Dems have $ and polling advantages.

Via @CJR

cjr.org/political_pres…
And the press isn’t completely wrong. This is an actual shot of @PaulBegala on @CNN last night.

cjr.org/political_pres… Image
Here’s the full primal scream AAAAARRRRGGGGHHHHH
Read 5 tweets
20 Oct
When the NYT eliminated its public editor, it said "our followers on social media and readers have come together to serve as a watchdog, more vigilant than one person could ever be."

They failed to realize how the Times staff would turn on each other.

vice.com/en/article/k7a…
Public editors like @Sulliview and Clark Hoyt served as a safety valve, giving staff (& readers) a legitimate resource where they could complaints, and expect a disinterested follow-through. Without the public editor, these staff are more likely to wind up at each other's throats
Also, the idea that random people on Twitter are going to extract accountability from a newsroom -- as Arthur Sulzberger Jr said at the time -- was ludicrous in 2017, and it's more so now.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!