Not quite. Here's a thread on the central position of "prosperity doctrine" in Alberta conservatism. #ableg
While those with a stronger sense of faith tend to be conservative, not all Alberta conservatives are Christians a smaller number yet could be considered highly religious.
Yet, it is a strain of Protestant Evangelism that has left an indelible mark on Alberta conservatism.
Dating back to the early twentieth century -- when Bible Bill Aberhart and Ernest Manning married conservative approaches to economics, politics, and religion into the Social Credit movement -- Alberta conservatism has aligned itself with the "prosperity" doctrine or tradition.
Simply put, the mantra ties hard work and personal wealth to personal virtue and the will of God. (On the flipside, a lack of wealth is associated with lack of personal effort or worth).
In political terms, this translates into a reverence for capitalism and the accumulation of wealth and personal accountability that underpin it.
Aberhart and Manning tapped into the anti-establishment, sectarian sentiment against mainline churches as well, pitting populist Albertans against the “Big Shots” found among Central Canadian religious, political, and economic elites.
During and since the Cold War, the prosperity gospel’s faith in capitalism has morphed into anti-socialism and an insistence on individual freedom from government overreach.
Popular conflation of wealth and prosperity with greed has tempered people’s willingness to publicly espouse the prosperity doctrine. This is particularly true since the very public fall of several televangelists in the 1980s and 1990s.
Yet, it's no accident that the term "prosperity" remains a dog-whistle to those earlier conservative conceptions of “good = wealth” and “hard work” leads to the “good life” (i.e., the “American dream”).
Social Credit's "prosperity certificates" in the 1930s were echoed in Klein's "Prosperity Bonuses" in 2005. Both referred to the notion that Albertans had "earned" the wealth they enjoyed.
The term appears five times in the 2019 UCP platform, formed the core of the Alberta Chamber of Commerce's "Vote Prosperity" campaign in 2019, and was in the title of the Fraser Institute's 2019 election primer ("Alberta Prosperity: A Plan for Opportunity and Growth").
In the end, among other values, Alberta conservatism espouses "prosperity first," in that social justice must be preceded by provincial wealth. Progressives view the priorities and causality in the opposite order.
This said, the term "prosperity" is so embedded in Alberta's political culture that progressives have invoked it from time to time. Sometimes with notable success. The 2015 Notley campaign was explicit in its focus on "shared prosperity," for example.
The concept of "shared prosperity" is not foreign to Alberta conservatives, of course. It's used quite often to describe the province's contributions to Confederation.
As with any element of political culture, media plays an important role in embedding the concept of "prosperity" in the public psyche.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jared Wesley

Jared Wesley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrJaredWesley

18 Oct
Policy 11 is the clearest definition of two-tier healthcare I have seen in a Cdn major party platform (and I've reviewed over 1000). It's the only one I know to use the term "Private Tier" explicitly.

This is not the same as a "mixed" or "hybrid" systems. (Thread) #ableg
All universal healthcare systems allow some private provision of services, including Canada. This means Canadians with employer-provided insurance and deeper pockets get better care. This is unequal, but not the "tiered" system promoted in Policy 11.
Most mainstream parties frame this hybrid system as a necessary evil, emphasizing the importance of preserving the public component.

Policy 11 promotes the virtues of the private component, and calls for a new/expanded "Private Tier".

This is not the status quo.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!