.@UNHumanRights still claims a right to lie. So, here's the truth @hrw @AmnestyEU @UNWatch @ISHRglobal, @WIN. This is a quote from the final Ethics findings: "the management was naturally and perhaps primarily interested in good relations with the member state (China);" /1
the Complainant (me) was interested in human rights and protection of human rights activists. OHCHR was, by virtue of the Complainant’s whistleblowing, placed in a very awkward diplomatic position by a human rights issue that it struggled to handle well... /2
A whistleblower’s reporting of such a practice, which was contrary to fundamental UN principles and values, is exactly the sort of activity that must be protected; it is far more important than minor infractions of bureaucratic rules." I couldn't agree more. /3
So, @UNHumanRights, explain to @Dolkun_Isa @Genghe1 and all the others whose names you handed over why you prioritised your relationship with China over their safety. And @antonioguterres, why do you *still* refuse to protect me? @anticorruption @GovAcctProj /4
Pics of original document here, for avoidance of doubt (the Member State is China, and I'm the Complainant). As the judge in my case said before he was removed without notice, confidentiality exists to protect me from the @UN, not @UN from its own policies. /5 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
