Here’s a thread about the fundamental constituents of the universe, as explained by @nattyover, with graphics by Samuel Velasco and @LucyIkkanda.
In the 1970s, physicists formed a framework that encapsulates our best understanding of nature’s fundamental order. Yet most visualizations of the Standard Model of particle physics are too simple, ignore important interconnections or are overwhelming.
The most common visualization of the Standard Model shows a periodic table of particles, but doesn’t offer insight into the relationships between them. It also leaves out key properties like “color.”
A visualization of the Standard Model created for the 2013 film “Particle Fever” emphasizes the Higgs boson, but places it beside the photon and gluon, particles unaffected by the Higgs.
In the first part of a four-part series on the hidden structure of the universe, Quanta has developed a new interactive map of the Standard Model of particle physics based on the “double simplex” representation developed by @Fermilab physicist @chrisquigg.
Matter comes in two main varieties: quarks and leptons. Two types of quarks form the protons and neutrons inside atomic nuclei: up quarks, each of which carries two-thirds of a unit of electric charge, and the down quark, with an electric charge of –1/3.
Up and down quarks can be either “left-handed” or “right-handed” depending on whether they are spinning clockwise or counterclockwise with respect to their direction of motion.
The weak force allows left-handed up and down quarks to transform into each other when they exchange a particle called a W boson. Right-handed quarks can’t do this due to a lack of right-handed W bosons in nature.
Quarks also have a kind of charge called color. A quark’s color (red, green or blue) makes it sensitive to the strong force. The strong force binds quarks of different colors into colorless composite particles such as protons and neutrons.
Quarks transform from one color to another by absorbing or emitting particles called gluons, the carriers of the strong force. These interactions form the sides of a triangle.
Because gluons possess color charge themselves, they constantly interact with one another as well as with quarks. The interactions between gluons fill the triangle in.
Leptons, the other kind of matter particles in addition to quarks, come in two types: electrons, which have an electric charge of −1, and neutrinos, which are neutral.
Like left-handed up and down quarks, left-handed electrons and neutrinos can transform into each other via the weak interaction. However, right-handed neutrinos have not been seen in nature. Leptons don’t possess color charge or interact via the strong force.
The left-handed particles on the left and right-handed particles on the right come together to form the basic skeleton of @chrisquigg’s double simplex.
Three progressively heavier but otherwise identical generations of each type of matter particle exist. (Note that neutrinos have small but unknown masses.)
A small amount of weak interaction happens between left-handed quarks in different generations; an up quark could occasionally spit out a W+ boson and become a strange quark, for example. Leptons have not been observed interacting in this manner.
All particles except neutrinos are also sensitive to the electromagnetic force and interact with one another by exchanging photons, which carry that force. In the double simplex, we represent electromagnetic interactions as white wavy lines.
In addition to W+ and W– bosons, there is another carrier of the weak force — a neutral carrier called the Z⁰ boson. Particles can absorb or emit Z⁰ bosons without changing identities. “Weak neutral interactions” are represented here by orange wavy lines.
Finally, Higgs bosons — excitations of the universe’s Higgs field — bump into electrons, slowing them down and giving them mass. In general, the more a particle interacts with the Higgs boson, the more mass it has. And with that, we have the Standard Model of particle physics:
Time has fascinated the human mind for millennia. Through the vantage points of culture, physics, timekeeping and biology, we have compiled a special timeline organizing some of the efforts that humans have made to understand time. (thread) quantamagazine.org/what-is-time-a…
Western culture tends to emphasize a linear conception of time, but the ancestors of today’s Australian aboriginal peoples embraced a timeless view of nature. In Asia, followers of Hinduism and Buddhism adopted a cyclic view.
Some of the best evidence for how ancient cultures viewed time can be found in artifacts of timekeeping mechanisms, like Egyptian sundials and circular Mayan calendars.
The revered condensed matter physicist Philip Anderson passed away yesterday at the age of 97. Here is a sampling of some of Anderson’s ideas that have propelled modern physics. (Thread)
Anderson won the 1977 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of what is now called Anderson localization, a phenomenon in which some waves stay within a given “local” region rather than advancing freely.
Quanta covered new advances in the understanding of Anderson localization in 2017 in an article that later became an episode of the Quanta Science Podcast: quantamagazine.org/mathematicians…
Most of us imagine the universe as extending forever in all directions. Does it have to be so? (Thread) quantamagazine.org/what-is-the-ge…
After all, because of the planet’s very subtle curvature, everyone once thought that the Earth was flat. Now, of course, we know it’s shaped like a sphere.
Is our contemporary mental model of a vast, infinitely expansive universe similarly flawed?
Rock-paper-scissors is a classic problem in game theory that’s also a touchstone concept in biology because of its relevance to evolution and ecology. ✊🤚✌️
Here’s why.
A thread: (1/9)
Since 1960, biologists have pondered “the paradox of the plankton”: How can ecosystems stably hold so many competing species? Why doesn’t the fittest eliminate the rest? (2/9)
One possible answer is the kill-the-winner hypothesis: As a predator thrives, it attracts more predators of itself. That response should in theory stabilize the system. (3/9)