“Our investigation found that the Labour Party breached the Equality Act 2010 by committing unlawful harassment through the acts of its agents in *two* of the complaints we investigated.”
Two too many, of course but still...two. It continues:
“These included using antisemitic tropes & suggesting that complaints of antisemitism were fake or smears. As these people were acting as agents of the Labour Party, Labour was legally responsible for their conduct.”
It goes on” A further 18 ‘borderline’ cases. In these cases, there was not enough evidence to conclude that the Labour Party was legally responsible for the conduct of the individual. These were people such as local councillors, local candidates &...” >
Constituency Labour Party office holders.
• In many more files, evidence of antisemitic conduct by an ‘ordinary’ member of the Labour Party. These members did not hold any office or role, therefore the Labour Party could not be held directly...” >
responsible for their conduct under the Equality Act 2010.
In light of our position as a regulator, we only made findings of unlawful conduct in cases that were sufficiently clear-cut, in Equality Act 2010 and Human Rights Act 1998 terms.”
The EHRC isn’t VAR. >
What they’ve produced is an entirely reasonable, cautious document saying a major organisation had failings, that it improved, and it still has a way to go.
Solidarity to anyone who feels like crap today, particularly Jewish comrades. To anyone gloating about what they do/don’t find in report, don’t. Just stick to what is there rather than spin.
I’m grateful to live in a country where a public body produces a report so diligently.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After declaring the climate crisis is a threat to most life on Earth David Attenborough said disruptive protest was unacceptable and that the answer is individuals using less.
The disconnect between analysis & prescription couldn’t be more irrational.
This isn’t a remotely serious response. Two degrees is likely already locked in, mostly as a result of CO2 already emitted. We are living amid the 6th great extinction & immense change is on the way.
A lot of this boils down to the idea that ‘cultural change’ is the decisive factor in change happening, it isn’t.
The factory acts, the abolition of slavery, civil rights and so on had to be legislated for. They also needed a measure of coercion - the state.
The report on allegations of sexual harassment in the @GMB_union, & their handling, is remarkable.
“The GMB is institutionally sexist. The General Secretaries and all regional secretaries are, and always have been, men. Women are underrepresented throughout the GMB’s ranks.”
>
“There is significant job segregation at regional level, with officer grades disproportionately filled by men and staff grades disproportionately filled by women.”
“Bullying, misogyny, cronyism and sexual harassment are endemic within the GMB.”
>
“The culture in the GMB is one of heavy drinking and late night socialising, salacious gossip and a lack of professionalism.”
Strong conclusions on how hundreds of thousands of members are being best served.
Britain's over 85 population will double between 2015 & 2030. Ageing means high public debt, low growth & dependency ratios that end the welfare state.
The challenge is as big as climate change & is the basis of my next book 'Mortals' with @VersoBooks
This is a global phenomenon: Today, across the world, there are 6.3 people of working age for every person over 65. The UN claims that figure will fall to 3.4 to 1 by 2050, and 2.4 to 1 by 2100.
>
For some the ‘future’ of ageing & population decline is already here. Japan, which had a population of 128 million in 2010 is expected to fall below 100 million by 2050. For some economists its shrinking working age population is a major factor behind its long term stagnation.
NEW: Among those suspended in relation to the leaked Labour report is Emilie Oldknow OBE - formerly senior management and now deputy Secretary General at Unison.
Only months ago Oldknow was a contender to be party general secretary.
“In a document sent to the party’s national executive committee (NEC) as far back as 19 May, deputy leader Angela Rayner made clear that both she and Starmer take, “issues such as racism, sexism & bullying exceptionally seriously”.
The suspensions only became public (although not names) after member Mark Howell brought a civil claim against the party, as well as Iain McNicol and David Evans, for “breach of contract”.
According to Howell the party “delayed until the eleventh hour”.
There are 7 suspensions in relation to the leaked Labour report covered by @novaramedia in April. The suspensions aren’t recent, and happened as far back as a month ago (1/3) >
There’s frustration among members that nothing (seemingly) had been done, but party looks to have been subject to number of legal threats. (2/3) >
One NEC source said “There is no place for these people in the Labour Party. I was encouraged to hear Angela Rayner in her update to the NEC be explicitly clear that such behaviour will not be tolerated and that action will not held up by the independent inquiry." (3/3)
Currently assistant general secretary at @unisontheunion, in 2017 Oldknow was Labour’s executive director for governance, membership and party services – making her part of a senior management team who the document alleges conspired to replace Corbyn as leader.
This conversation took place in relation to the Manchester Gorton by-election selection. While the media regularly claimed Corbyn rigged candidate selections to favour ‘his people’, the conversation detailed here appears to indicate the precise opposite of that.