NEW: 'Unprecedented' legal case sees cross-party MPs & peers take legal action against a sitting govt for failing to safeguard national security. Believed to be first time ever. Former National Security Advisor backing it. This is a big deal. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Here's @lukeharding1968's write-up in @guardian. Lord Ricketts, former chair of Joint Intelligence Committee & National Security Advisor has submitted witness statement in support. It's genuinely cross-party effort. Because: national security NOT politics theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
And last but not least the lawyers & journalists & filmmakers & ad creatives & many others who make up & support @allthecitizens. Also: the Red Army Choir. For this masterful rendition of the James Bond theme tune..
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
LIVE now: We’re releasing shocking new research from @Avaaz on spread of Hunter/Biden misinfo in swing states on Facebook. Plus an amazing power panel on voter suppression with @ruha9@safiyanoble & @digitalsista
Incredible stats about how Facebook’s algorithm is amplifying Hunter/Biden story to more than 50 million people. ‘We were really shaken by these results,’ says @fadiquran from Avaaz. ‘We surveyed voters in Pennsylvania & found 86% of them had seen this misinfo & 35% believed it’
Powerful words from @ruha9 on voter suppression. ‘Black people are the prime targets of voter suppression.. Facebook is not simply ignoring this. It’s profiting from it. This is racial capitalism’
Hoping Brexiteers who failed to back calls for an inquiry into Russian interference see this. Next time, it might be other side that benefits. Foreign interference not about politics it’s national security. And zero done has been done to protect us
cc @TomTugendhat@IoWBobSeely
I am a huge fan of @FT's journalism. I subscribe to the @FT & support its journalism. And I think it really needs to examine its coverage of Cambridge Analytica & its own involvement with the firm, @khalafroula.
Last week, a journalist who had not covered the story previously wrote a blogpost below. It failed to note even basic background context of @iconews's inquiry & set off cascade of other stories that claimed @observeruk's investigation had been 'debunked' ft.com/content/aa235c…
A follow-up piece was littered with inaccuracies. The allegations are falsely represented. Even the account of how the inquiry began is factually incorrect.
In fairness: this is a difficult, complex story that has unfolded over years.
Everything about this story is hard to follow. But here's what you need to understand: AIQ is company at the heart of Brexit. Found by Cummings. Used by 4 different campaigns. Who by law not allowed to co-ordinate. (Though we know at least 2 of them did - Vote Leave & BeLeave)
Last week, @ICOnews told DCMS committee 'AIQ has consistently denied have a closer relationship beyond that between a software developer & their client'. And that all work was 'conducted with SCL & not CA'.
These docs - which @ICOnews has - flatly contradict this
'AggregateIQ - IN PARTNERSHIP WITH - Cambridge Analytica'
2 companies
Operating together as ***1 legal entity***
'Aggregate IQ in partnership with Cambridge Analytica'
From Brittany's new data dump. I really didn't mean to look tonight...but my god.
For the Brits: incontrovertible evidence AIQ - firm at heart of Brexit contracted by Cummings - was operating as single legal entity with Cambridge Analytica
(Previously: denied, denied, denied)
For the Americans: Cambridge Analytica started working for Trump in Sept, 2015
This contract dates from 11 months before it was announced that Cambridge Analytica was working for the Trump campaign.
And overlaps with period when Cambridge Analytica was working for Ted Cruz